Beliefs associated with Intentions of Non-Physician Healthcare Workers to Receive the COVID-19 Vaccine in Ontario, Canada ========================================================================================================================= * Laura Desveaux * Rachel D. Savage * Mina Tadrous * Natasha Kithulegoda * Kelly Thai * Nathan M. Stall * Noah M. Ivers ## Abstract Achieving herd immunity of SARS-CoV-2 through vaccines will require a concerted effort to understand and address barriers to vaccine uptake. We conducted a web-based survey of non-physician HCWs, informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework, measuring intention to vaccinate, beliefs and sources of influence relating to the COVID-19 vaccines, and sociodemographic characteristics. Vaccination non-intent was associated with beliefs that vaccination was not required because of good health, lower confidence that the COVID-19 vaccine would protect their family and patients, and that getting vaccinated was a professional responsibility. Vaccination non-intent was strongly associated with mistrust about how fast the vaccines were developed and vaccine safety concerns. Communication directed at non-physician HCWs should be tailored by ethnic subgroups and settings to increase salience. Messaging should leverage emotions (e.g., pride, hope, fear) to capture interest, while addressing safety concerns and confirming the low risk of side effects in contrast to the substantial morbidity and mortality of COVID-19. Emergent data about reduced transmission post-vaccination will be helpful. ## Background Achieving herd immunity of SARS-CoV-2 through vaccines will require a concerted effort to understand and address barriers to vaccine uptake. Initial vaccination of healthcare workers (HCWs) is essential because of their high risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure, close contact with vulnerable populations, and potential to act as role models and influencers1. Unfortunately, 1/6 of HCWs are reluctant to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, citing concerns around vaccine safety and effectiveness, data transparency, and coercion2. ## Methods We conducted a web-based survey of non-physician HCWs, informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework3, measuring intention to vaccinate, beliefs and sources of influence relating to the COVID-19 vaccines, and sociodemographic characteristics. Vaccination intention was measured with the question “How likely is it that you would get a COVID-19 vaccine?”. Sociodemographic characteristics collected included: age, gender, ethnicity, education, healthcare worker role and setting. Group comparisons were made using χ2 tests and corresponding adjusted associations were made using multivariable logistic regression. The survey was distributed electronically via a large Canadian healthcare union in Ontario, Canada from January 4-12, 2021. The study was approved by the Women’s College Hospital Research Ethics Board and reporting followed the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys. ## Results The participation rate was 85% (8,634 completed/10,193 accessed). Participants were mostly female (89.2%), healthcare aid/personal support workers (42.8%), employed full-time (67.2%), and working in the continuing care setting (64.6%), which includes home care, supportive living, and nursing homes. Overall, 80.4% of HCWs reported that they were likely to get a COVID-19 vaccine (Table 1). View this table: [Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/26/2021.02.19.21251936/T1) Table 1. Characteristics of participants, overall and by initial willingness to get a COVID-19 vaccine. After adjustment (Table 2), sociodemographic factors independently associated with unwillingness to vaccinate included younger age (<40 years) and attainment of less than a high school diploma. The effect of healthcare setting varied by ethnicity, with HCWs of Filipino ethnicity working in continuing care and HCWs of Caribbean ethnicity working in acute care having a greater likelihood of non-intent. Vaccination non-intent was associated with beliefs that i) vaccination was not required because of one’s own good health, ii) lower confidence that the COVID-19 vaccine would protect their family and patients, and iii) that getting vaccinated was not a professional responsibility. Vaccination non-intent was strongly associated with mistrust about how fast the vaccines were developed and vaccine safety concerns. Public health websites and healthcare providers were trusted sources of COVID-19 information. HCWs with vaccination intent were more likely to get vaccinated if direct financial supports (e.g. paid sick days) were provided (74% vs 25%, P<0.001). View this table: [Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/26/2021.02.19.21251936/T2) Table 2. Factors associated with non-intent to take a COVID-19 vaccine. ## Discussion This survey of 8,634 non-physician HCWs in Ontario, Canada indicated that the majority (80.4%) intend to take a COVID-19 vaccine. The 19.6% of non-physician HCWs expressing initial unwillingness to vaccinate are a key target for communication efforts and behaviorally informed strategies4, and may be underestimated due to social desirability bias. History of flu shot refusal may be a useful proxy for needing special outreach regarding COVID-19 vaccinations. Communication directed at non-physician HCWs5 should be tailored by ethnic subgroups and settings to increase salience. Messaging should leverage emotions (e.g., pride, hope, fear) to capture interest, while addressing safety concerns and confirming the low risk of side effects in contrast to the substantial morbidity and mortality of COVID-19. Emergent data about reduced transmission post-vaccination will be helpful. Communication channels should leverage credible sources including public health organizations, employers (i.e., healthcare institutions), and trusted healthcare providers. In addition to targeted communication, financial and logistical supports (e.g., paid time off to get vaccinated, guaranteed sick leave in case of vaccine side effects, providing transportation to vaccine clinics or administering the vaccine on-site at workplaces) could further increase vaccine uptake, especially for this population who are often poorly paid without full-time work and benefits. 6 ## Data Availability The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available as they are owned by the union who administered the survey. ## Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), a union which represents over 2-million members across North America, and specifically SEIU Healthcare in Ontario for their partnership in designing and administering the survey. We would also like to acknowledge the healthcare workers who took the time to complete this survey and Dr. Mina Tadrous for his in-kind guidance regarding the analysis. ## Footnotes * Corrected an error (belief associated with non-intent was that vaccination was \*not\* part of professional role) and added a co-author (who was previously in acknowledgements). * Received February 19, 2021. * Revision received February 24, 2021. * Accepted February 26, 2021. * © 2021, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ## References 1. 1.Gharpure R, Guo A, Bishnoi C, et al. Early COVID-19 First-Dose Vaccination Coverage Among Residents and Staff Members of Skilled Nursing Facilities Participating in the Pharmacy Partnership for Long-Term Care Program — United States, December 2020– January 2021. 2021. 2. 2.Roy B, Kumar V, Venktesh A. Health Care Workers’ Reluctance to Take the Covid-19 Vaccine: A Consumer-Marketing Approach to Identifying and Overcoming Hesitancy. NEJM Catalyst. 2020:1–10. 3. 3.Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, et al. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(1):26–33. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoicWhjIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjc6IjE0LzEvMjYiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMS8wMi8yNi8yMDIxLjAyLjE5LjIxMjUxOTM2LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 4. 4.Fisher KA, Bloomstone SJ, Walder J, Crawford S, Fouayzi H, Mazor KM. Attitudes Toward a Potential SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine : A Survey of U.S. Adults. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173(12):964–973. 5. 5.Unroe KT, Evans R, Weaver L, Rusyniak D, Blackburn J. Willingness of Long-Term Care Staff to Receive a COVID-19 Vaccine: A Single State Survey. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020. 6. 6.Volpp KG, Loewenstein G, Buttenheim AM. Behaviorally Informed Strategies for a National COVID-19 Vaccine Promotion Program. JAMA. 2021;325(2):125–126.