Ventricular expansion, white matter hyperintensities, and global cognition in Alzheimer’s disease and normal aging ==================================================================================================================== * Sabrina Adamo * Joel Ramirez * Melissa F. Holmes * Fuqiang Gao * Ljubica Zotovic * Mario Masellis * Sandra E. Black ## ABSTRACT **Background** The progression of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) may be tracked by measuring the growth of the ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (vCSF) over time. AD is commonly comorbid with markers of cerebral small vessel disease (SVD), viewed on MRI as white matter hyperintensities (WMH). Larger WMH volumes are correlated with poorer cognitive test scores. Additionally, periventricular WMHs have a proposed relationship to the vCSF. **Purpose** This study will examine ventricular expansion and its associations between periventricular/deep WMH and cognition in AD and normal aging. **Methods** Baseline and 1-year follow-up data were collected from AD (n=117) and cognitively normal control (NCs; n=49) participants taking part in the Sunnybrook Dementia Study. MRI (1.5T) and scores from both the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) were assessed at each time point. Volumetric data was generated using a semi-automated pipeline and each individual’s vCSF and WMHs were transformed to an intermediate space to determine volumetric growth. Regressions were used to determine relationships between vCSF growth measures, SVD burden, and cognition, accounting for demographics and individual interscan intervals. **Results** The AD group displayed 14.6% annual ventricular growth as opposed to NC who had only 11.8% annual growth. AD showed significant growth in vCSF (p < 0.001), a trend toward greater pWMH growth (p = 0.06) and no difference in dWMH growth volumes compared to NC. vCSF growth was positively associated with pWMH (β = 0.32, p < 0.001) but not dWMH growth in AD while in NC it was associated with both pWMH (β = 0.48, p < 0.001) and dWMH growth (β = 0.35, p = 0.02). In AD, vCSF growth was associated with the both the MMSE (β = -0.30, p < 0.001) and the DRS (β = -0.31, p < 0.001) in separate models. **Conclusions** The findings from this study suggest that in just under 1.5 years, the significantly rapid ventricular expansion observed in AD may be closely related to periventricular small vessel disease. As vCSF growth rates are an important biomarker of AD neurodegeneration that corresponds with cognitive decline, future research should further explore atrophy associated with periventricular vasculopathy. **Trial Registration** [ClinicalTrials.gov](http://ClinicalTrials.gov), [NCT01800214](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT01800214&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.30.20240879.atom). Registered on 27 February 2013. Key Words * Alzheimer’s disease * ventricular expansion * disease progression * white matter hyperintensities * dementia * cerebral small vessel disease * cognition ## Background The progression of neurodegeneration due to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) can be evaluated by ventricular expansion measured from serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [1,2]. As a reliable indicator of brain atrophy and disease progression, ventricular expansion may be a useful biomarker for clinical trials. In a mixed dementia population, participants with larger ventricles showed signs of lower cognitive reserve [3]. Specifically in AD, ventricular atrophy has been linked with cognitive impairment and future cognitive decline [4]. Moreover ventricular expansion rate has been shown to differ between normal aging, MCI, and AD demonstrating its utility as a marker for progression along the disease spectrum [5,6]. Additionally, correlations with MRI-based markers of cerebral small vessel disease (SVD), measured by white matter hyperintensity (WMH) burden, may also be helpful predictors of future brain atrophy and disease progression [7–9]. The National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association (NIA-AA) core clinical criteria [10] for the diagnosis of probable/possible AD allows for minimal burden of WMH, however in a real-world community-based and memory clinic setting, SVD is often seen comorbidly with AD [11]. Both AD and SVD pathologies are highly concurrent [8,12] and greater WMH load has also been linked with late onset AD [13]. Previous findings suggest periventricular (pWMH) moreso than deep WMH (dWMH), may be more closely related to ventricular expansion due to its hypothesized role as the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation and waste clearance in the brain [14]. In addition to vCSF growth, WMH burden has also been linked with cognitive decline in AD [15]. Furthermore, patients with concomitant AD and vascular pathologies such as atherosclerosis (large blood vessels) and arteriolosclerosis (small blood vessels) have been shown to have lower global cognitive test scores [16]. This study will examine the relationship between changes in vCSF/WMH and cognition within the setting of AD and normal aging, determining its validity as a biomarker for tracking disease progression. The two hypotheses for this study are: 1) vCSF growth will be correlated with pWMH but not dWMH; and 2) baseline cognitive test scores will predict vCSF growth in AD but not normal aging. ## Methods ### Participants Study participants were recruited as part of the Sunnybrook Dementia Study (SDS; [ClinicalTrials.gov](http://ClinicalTrials.gov) NCT 01800214) conducted at the Linda C. Campbell Cognitive Neurology Research Unit, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program at Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Canada. Patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD: n=117) as well as cognitively normal controls (NC: n=49) with longitudinal neuroimaging and neuropsychological testing were included in the study. All AD patients met the National Institute on Aging - Alzheimer’s Association criteria [10] for probable/possible AD. Participants with a history of head trauma, substance abuse, overt stroke, tumours, or other mental illness unrelated to dementia were excluded, however, the presence of white matter hyperintensities on MRI were not exclusionary for both AD and NC participants. NCs were required to meet strict guidelines based on neuropsychological testing to ensure they were within normal cognitive limits for their age and education levels. Among other neuropsychological assessments, all participants were tested on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Dementia Rating Scale (DRS), both of which assess global cognitive functioning. Only participants with an inter-scan interval (ISI) within 1-3 years were included in the study. Research was ethically conducted and approved by the Sunnybrook Research Ethics Board. ### MRI procedures Standardized brain imaging protocol was acquired on a 1.5T GE Signa scanner (Milwaukee, WI, USA) with a mean ISI of 1.3 years (Table 1). Detailed information regarding MRI acquisition protocol are previously published [17]. View this table: [Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/30/2020.11.30.20240879/T1) Table 1. **Demographics and raw baseline volumetric data**. The full methods used to extract volumetric imaging data on an individual basis have been previously described [18–20]. In summary, the Supratentorial Total Intracranial Volume (ST-TIV) was segmented into grey matter (GM), white matter (WM), sulcal (sCSF) and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (vCSF) using an automated histogram-based segmentation tool [21]. White matter hyperintensities (WMH) were then classified using a tri-feature (T1/PD/T2) segmentation tool and automatically sub-classified WMH into either deep (dWMH), periventricular (pWMH), or lacunes [19]. The dynamic progression method is previously published [17]. In brief, participant baseline and follow-up vCSF and WMH segmentations were registered to an intermediate space then masked using the ‘fslmaths’ command [22] to generate spatial difference and overlap maps. Spatial difference maps included the growth (“grow”, where volume existed in follow-up but not in baseline), shrinkage (“shrink”, where volume existed in baseline but not in follow-up), and spatial overlap maps (“stable”, common in both baseline and follow-up) (**Figure 1**). ![Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2020/11/30/2020.11.30.20240879/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/30/2020.11.30.20240879/F1) Figure 1. T1 image of the same patient at baseline (left), follow up (right), and an intermediate space (center). Baseline ventricles are shown in green and follow up in purple. ### Statistical Analysis IBM SPSS (version 24) was used to run all statistical analyses. The mean raw volumes were displayed for transparency, however statistical analyses were run on normalized variables where applicable. One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to test for between-group differences. A Pearson’s chi-squared test was used to examine between-group sex differences. Effect sizes were determined using Cohen’s d. Linear regressions were used to determine the relationships between ventricular growth, cognition and SVD burden. Two models were tested using either the MMSE (Model 1) or DRS (Model 2) to assess for cognition. ## Results Demographic information is presented in **Table 1**. There was no significant difference between AD and NC in age, sex, interscan interval (ISI), or Supratentorial Total Intracranial Volume (ST-TIV). The AD cohort had significantly lower cognitive test scores on both the MMSE (p < 0.001) and DRS (p < 0.001) than the NC cohort. AD also had a significantly smaller Brain Parenchymal Fraction (BPF; p < 0.001), as well as lower volumes for Normal Appearing Grey Matter (NAGM; p < 0.001), Normal Appearing White Matter (NAWM; p < 0.001), and both right (p < 0.001) and left (p < 0.001) hippocampal volumes. AD had greater volumes of vCSF (p < 0.001), sCSF (p < 0.001), pWMH (p = 0.03), and dWMH (p = 0.02). ### Main finding Dynamic progression analyses (**Table 2**) revealed that in just under 1.5 years, AD patients exhibited a greater increase in vCSF growth (p < 0.001, **Figure 2c**) and a trend toward greater pWMH growth (p = 0.06) while controlling for age, sex, education, and ISI (**Figure 2f**). There was no significant growth of dWMH volumes (**Figure 2i**). One AD participant was removed from this analysis as a pWMH outlier, bringing the sample to 116. Similar results were also obtained when running the analyses after removing the outlier from the AD group (**Figure 2f**). View this table: [Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/30/2020.11.30.20240879/T2) Table 2. **Ventricular and White Matter Hyperintensity Progression** ![Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2020/11/30/2020.11.30.20240879/F2.medium.gif) [Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/30/2020.11.30.20240879/F2) Figure 2. Ventricular growth (top), periventricular (middle), and deep (bottom) White Matter hyperintensities plotted against baseline MMSE and DRS scores. Box plots showing the distribution of each respective growth volumes between diagnostic groupings. The AD cohort is in red and NCs are blue. ### Is vCSF growth associated with SVD burden? In AD patients, vCSF growth was positively associated with pWMH (β = 0.32, p < 0.001) but not with dWMH growth while correcting for Years of Education (YOE), ISI, and MMSE. ISI was associated with dWMH (β = 0.23, p = 0.03) but not pWMH. NCs, however showed significant associations between vCSF growth and both pWMH (β = 0.48, p < 0.001) and dWMH growth (β = 0.35, p = 0.02). YOE was negatively associated with pWMH in the NC cohort (β = -0.37, p = 0.01). ### Do baseline cognitive test scores predict ventricular growth? Model 1: In the AD group, vCSF growth showed a negative association with baseline MMSE (β = -0.30, p < 0.001, **Figure 2a**), with ISI (β = 0.40, p < 0.0001) and YOE (β = 0.24, p < 0.01) showing significant effects as well. For NCs, vCSF growth was not associated with MMSE, although there were significant associations with age (β = 0.35, p = 0.02) and sex (β = -0.33, p = 0.01) (**Table 3**). View this table: [Table 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/30/2020.11.30.20240879/T3) Table 3. **Summary of regressions** Model 2: Similar findings were shown when assessing the vCSF growth with baseline DRS (β = -0.31, p < 0.001, **Figure 2b**), ISI (β = 0.40, p < 0.0001) and YOE (β = 0.23, p = 0.01). NCs also showed similar associations in age (β = 0.38, p = 0.01) and sex (β = -0.37, p = 0.01), but not in DRS (**Table 3**). ## Discussion ### Main finding Our study found that AD displayed 14.6% annual ventricular growth as opposed to NCs who had only 11.8% annual growth. These numbers appear higher than those reported in the literature [1,23,24]; however, the present study used a newer imaging methodology to assess voxel-based progression as opposed to absolute volumetric difference (**Table 4**). Another possible explanation for these differences is that much of the recent literature has been based on the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), which has been considered to be a more “pure” AD sample with little vascular pathology in contrast to the “real-world” sample from the SDS [11]. View this table: [Table 4.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/30/2020.11.30.20240879/T4) Table 4. Present ventricular growth results compared with findings from previous research. Interestingly, the AD showed a trend toward greater pWMH growth than the NCs while there was no difference in dWMH suggesting that these two pathologies may progress differently in different populations. The literature surrounding WMHs in AD typically uses global volumes rather than subdivided into dWMH and pWMH, making comparisons to the presently observed trend difficult. However, in cognitively healthy elderly adults, pWMH volume has been correlated with more reduced cerebral blood flow than dWMH [25]. Differences in dWMH and pWMH in AD should be the target of future research, preferably with a large sample size to increase power. ### Is vCSF growth associated with SVD burden? The findings from the current study are consistent with previous research examining SVD and vCSF in AD. It has been shown that high SVD burden in AD is associated with larger ventricles [15] and greater vCSF growth over time [17] compared with NCs. A novel finding in the present study is that this relationship is not consistent with all types of SVD burden. In AD patients, greater vCSF growth was associated with greater pWMH while there was no significant difference in dWMH. To examine if severe periventricular white matter disease was driving these findings, we removed participants who had baseline pWMH volumes > 10cc (**Table 5**). The effect size for vCSF growth remained stable, in comparison to our entire sample (**Table 2**), providing support that the periventricular WMH load was not the main driving force for ventricular expansion. Additionally, an effect size calculation was calculated to determine the minimum number of participants required per group to detect a 25% change with alpha set to 0.05 at 80% power. It was determined that a minimum of 55 participants would be needed per group to detect this difference, although we would recommend 75 participants per group to account for 27% attrition. View this table: [Table 5:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/30/2020.11.30.20240879/T5) Table 5: Demographic and volumetric data for participants with pWMH volumes < 10cc.findings from previous research. Although the relationship between the vCSF and SVD is not completely understood, there are a few proposed theories that attempt to explain their association. In a pathology study, pWMH but not dWMH were significantly associated with breakdown of the ventricular lining, arteriosclerosis, and neurofibrillary tangles [26], suggesting that location of WMHs may have different underlying causes. It has also been shown that there is collagenosis of the deep medullary veins surrounding the ventricles in AD leading to periventricular infarcts and edema [27]. We predict that over time, these infarcts begin to fuse into the vCSF increasing the growth rate relative to NCs. Additionally, it has been shown that the ventricles have a role in waste clearance in the brain and that AD patients have reduced clearance relative to controls [14]. The increased venous collagenosis in AD patients may also play a role in slowing down the vCSF filtration and ultimately in the rapid volumetric growth. The link between vCSF growth and SVD can also be inferred from animal models and drug trials. AD has been linked with vascular risk factors such as hypertension [28] which correlates with greater cognitive impairment and neuropsychiatric symptoms [29]. In mouse models of AD, treating hypertension by use of an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) has been shown to improve cognitive functioning, reduce the inflammatory activation of astroglial and microglial cells, and some neurogenesis (although not statistically significance) [30]. This has led researchers to question whether treatments for hypertension, such as the use of an ARB, may slow ventricular atrophy ([ClinicalTrials.gov](http://ClinicalTrials.gov) ID: [NCT02085265](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT02085265&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.30.20240879.atom)) and preserve cognitive functioning in human trials [29,31]. ### Do baseline cognitive test scores predict ventricular growth? It is well established that brain atrophy measured by ventricular growth is correlated with cognitive decline [6,32] especially in AD [1,23,33]. Additionally, brain atrophy has been shown to predict future cognitive decline and disease progression from normal aging to mild cognitive impairment to AD [34,35]. The present study has taken a novel look at this relationship, showing that baseline cognitive test scores predict more rapid ventricular atrophy and disease progression within AD. Both the baseline MMSE and DRS scores were strongly predictive of future vCSF enlargement, which supports the clinical utility of those tools. The MMSE and DRS are both used frequently in clinical settings to assess current cognitive functionality. With the addition of this study, clinicians can also use these scores to predict brain atrophy rates if no intervention is introduced. ## Conclusions Our study findings demonstrate that real-world AD patients from a community-based memory clinic have significant and rapid ventricular expansion (∼15%/yr) that can be predicted using commonly used global cognitive tests (MMSE and DRS). This supports findings from other studies that recommend the use of vCSF expansion as an MRI-based AD biomarker of neurodegeneration in clinical trials. Additionally, we observed that in AD, ventricular expansion is more closely related to pWMH than dWMH, suggesting that periventricular vasculopathy plays a significant role in AD-related atrophy. As periventricular and deep WMH volumes are often combined as a single measure of vascular burden, future studies examining AD neurodegeneration should consider them as separate entities with different etiologies. ## Data Availability The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to consent-related issues conducting research embedded in care, however, data can be made available from the corresponding author upon request. ## Declarations ### Ethics approval and consent to participate This research was ethically conducted on consenting study participants and approved by the Sunnybrook Research Ethics Board. ### Consent for publication Not applicable ### Availability of data and materials The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to consent-related issues conducting research embedded in care, however, data can be made available from the corresponding author upon request. ### Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests ## Funding JR, MFH, SA and FG gratefully acknowledge financial and salary support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (#125740 & #13129), Heart & Stroke Foundation Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Research program at Sunnybrook Research Institute, and the Linda C. Campbell Foundation. JR additionally received partial funding from the Ontario Brain Institute’s Ontario Neurodegenerative Disease Research Initiative (Note: the opinions, results, and conclusions are those of the authors and no endorsement by the Ontario Brain Institute is intended or should be inferred). Lastly, MM and SEB would like to graciously thank the Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Department of Medicine, and the University of Toronto for financial and salary support. ## Authors’ contributions SA: Conceptualisation, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Validation, Visualisation, and Writing (draft, review, and editing) JR: Conceptualisation, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Writing (draft, review, and editing), and Supervision MFH: Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Writing (draft, review, editing) FG: Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Writing (review, editing), Supervision LZ: Project Administration, Writing (review), Resources MM: Conceptualisation, Supervision, Writing (review and editing), Resources, Funding Acquisition SEB: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing (review and editing), Resources, Funding Acquisition ## Acknowledgements We would like to thank the participants who have graciously donated their time, consent, and participation in the Sunny-brook Dementia Study. Thank you to the Linda C. Campbell foundation, the analysts, database experts, software developers, the BrainLab.ca neuroimaging team, psychometrists, and the cognitive neurology clinical team for their ongoing herculean efforts and contribution to this study. ## Abbreviations AD : Alzheimer’s Disease; ADNI : Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative; ANOVA : analysis of variance; BPF : brain parenchymal fraction; (v/s) CSF : ventricular/sulcal cerebrospinal fluid); DRS : Dementia Rating Scale; ISI : interscan interval; MMSE : Mini-Mental State Examination; MRI : magnetic resonance imaging; NAGM : normal appearing grey matter; NAWM : normal appearing white matter; NC : cognitively normal control; NIA-AA : National-Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association; SDS : Sunnybrook Dementia Study; ST-TIV : supratentorial-total intracranial volume; SVD : cerebral small vessel disease; (d/p) WMH : deep/periventricular white matter hyperintensity; YOE : years of education * Received November 30, 2020. * Revision received November 30, 2020. * Accepted November 30, 2020. * © 2020, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), CC BY-NC 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ## References 1. 1.Nestor SM, Rupsingh R, Borrie M, Smith M, Accomazzi V, Wells JL, et al. Ventricular enlargement as a possible measure of Alzheimer’s disease progression validated using the Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative database. Brain. 2008;131:2443–54. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/brain/awn146&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18669512&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.30.20240879.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000258862200019&link_type=ISI) 2. 2.Carmichael OT, Kuller LH, Lopez OL, Thompson PM, Dutton RA, Lu A, et al. Ventricular volume and dementia progression in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Neurobiol Aging. 2007;28:389–97. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.01.006&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16504345&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.30.20240879.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000244269800008&link_type=ISI) 3. 3.Sapkota S, Ramirez J, Stuss DT, Masellis M, Black SE. Clinical dementia severity associated with ventricular size is differentially moderated by cognitive reserve in men and women. Alzheimers Res Ther [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Nov 6];10:89. Available from: [https://alzres.biomedcentral.com/](https://alzres.biomedcentral.com/) articles/10.1186/s13195-018-0419-2 4. 4.Chou Y-Y, Leporé N, Saharan P, Madsen SK, Hua X, Jack CR, et al. Ventricular maps in 804 ADNI subjects: correlations with CSF biomarkers and clinical decline. Neurobiol Aging [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2014 Nov 7];31:1386–400. Available from: [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?](http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?) artid=2904619&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract 5. 5.Carmichael OT, Kuller LH, Lopez OL, Thompson PM, Dutton RA, Lu A, et al. Cerebral Ventricular Changes Associated With Transitions Between Normal Cognitive Function, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2007;21:14–24. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/WAD.0b013e318032d2b1&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17334268&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.30.20240879.atom) 6. 6.Carlson NE, Moore MM, Dame A, Howieson D, Silbert LC, Quinn JF, et al. Trajectories of brain loss in aging and the development of cognitive impairment. Neurology. 2008;70:828–33. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1212/01.wnl.0000280577.43413.d9&link_type=DOI) 7. 7.Lee S, Viqar F, Zimmerman ME, Narkhede A, Tosto G, Benzinger TLS, et al. White matter hyperintensities are a core feature of Alzheimer’s disease: Evidence from the dominantly inherited Alzheimer network. Ann Neurol [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Jul 11];79:929–39. Available from: [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27016429](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27016429) 8. 8.Sweeney MD, Montagne A, Sagare AP, Nation DA, Schneider LS, Chui HC, et al. Vascular dysfunction-The disregarded partner of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Mar 24];15:158–67. Available from: [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30642436](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30642436) 9. 9.Iturria-Medina Y, Sotero RC, Toussaint PJ, Mateos-Pérez JM, Evans AC, Weiner MW, et al. Early role of vascular dysregulation on late-onset Alzheimer’s disease based on multifactorial data-driven analysis. Nat Commun [Internet]. 2016;7:11934. Available from: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11934](http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11934) [http://10.1038/ncomms11934](http://10.1038/ncomms11934) 10. 10.McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR, Kawas CH, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement [Internet]. Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. guy.mckhann{at}jhu.edu; 2011;7:263–9. Available from: [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21514250](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21514250) 11. 11.Ramirez J, McNeely AA, Scott CJM, Masellis M, Black SE. White matter hyperintensity burden in elderly cohort studies. The Sunnybrook Dementia Study, Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, and Three-City Study. Alzheimers Dement [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Jul 29]; Available from: [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26208292](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26208292) 12. 12.Koncz R, Sachdev PS. Are the brain’s vascular and Alzheimer pathologies additive or interactive? Curr Opin Psychiatry [Internet]. 2018;31:147–52. Available from: [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29232251](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29232251) 13. 13.Ortner M, Kurz A, Alexopoulos P, Auer F, Diehl-Schmid J, Drzezga A, et al. Small Vessel Disease, but Neither Amyloid Load nor Metabolic Deficit, Is Dependent on Age at Onset in Alzheimer’s Disease. Biol Pyschiatry. 2015;77:704–10. 14. 14.de Leon MJ, Li Y, Okamura N, Tsui WH, Saint-Louis LA, Glodzik L, et al. Cerebrospinal Fluid clearance in Alzheimer Disease measured with dynamic PET. J Nucl Med [Internet]. 2017;58:1471–6. Available from: [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28302766](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28302766) 15. 15.Coutu J, Goldblatt A, Rosas HD, Salat DH. White Matter Changes are Associated with Ventricular Expansion in Aging, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2016;49:329–42. 16. 16.Arvanitakis Z, Capuano AW, Leurgans SE, Bennett DA, Schneider JA. Relation of cerebral vessel disease to Alzheimer’s disease dementia and cognitive function in elderly people: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Neurol. Elsevier Ltd; 2016;:1–10. 17. 17.Ramirez J, McNeely AA, Berezuk C, Gao F, Black SE. Dynamic progression of white matter hyperintensities in Alzheimer’s disease and normal aging: Results from the Sunnybrook dementia study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2016;8:1– 9. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fnagi.2016.00322&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=28082896&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.30.20240879.atom) 18. 18.Dade LA, Gao F, Kovacevic N, Roy P, Rockel C, O’Toole CM, et al. SA-BRE: A time efficient semi-automated regional parcellation method for structural magnetic resonance brain images. 2003. 19. 19.Ramirez J, Gibson E, Quddus A, Lobaugh NJ, Feinstein A, Levine B, et al. Lesion Explorer: A comprehensive segmentation and parcellation package to obtain regional volumetrics for subcortical hyperintensities and intracranial tissue. Neuroimage [Internet]. Elsevier Inc.; 2011;54:963–73. Available from: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.013](http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.013) 20. 20.The Sunnybrook Dementia Study [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 19]. Available from: [www.brainlab.ca/sunnybrookdementiastudy](http://www.brainlab.ca/sunnybrookdementiastudy) 21. 21.Kovacevic N, Lobaugh NJ, Bronskill MJ, Levine B, Feinstein A, Black SE. A robust method for extraction and automatic segmentation of brain images. Neuroimage. Sunnybrook and Women’s College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2002;17:1087–100. 22. 22.Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Woolrich MW, Smith SM. Fsl. Neuroimage. 2012;62:782–90. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21979382&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.30.20240879.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000306390600032&link_type=ISI) 23. 23.Evans MC, Barnes J, Nielsen C, Kim LG, Clegg SL, Blair M, et al. Volume changes in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment?: cognitive associations. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:674–82. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00330-009-1581-5&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19760240&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.30.20240879.atom) 24. 24.Schott JM, Price SL, Frost C, Whitwell JL, Rossor MN, Fox NC. Measuring atrophy in Alzheimer disease: A serial MRI study over 6 and 12 months. Neurology. 2005;65:119–24. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1212/01.wnl.0000167542.89697.0f&link_type=DOI) 25. 25.Bahrani AA, Powell DK, Yu G, Johnson ES, Jicha GA, Smith CD. White Matter Hyperintensity Associations with Cerebral Blood Flow in Elderly Subjects Stratified by Cerebrovascular Risk. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis [Internet]. Elsevier Inc.; 2017;26:779–86. Available from: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/](http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/) j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.10.017 26. 26.Shim YS, Yang D-W, Roe CM, Coats MA, Benzinger TL, Xiong C, et al. Pathological Correlates of White Matter Hyperintensities on Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord [Internet]. 2015;39:92–104. Available from: [https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/366411](https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/366411) 27. 27.Keith J, Gao F, Noor R, Kiss A, Balasubramaniam G, Au K, et al. Collagenosis of the Deep Medullary Veins: An Underrecognized Pathologic Correlate of White Matter Hyperintensities and Periventricular Infarction? J Neuropathol Exp Neurol [Internet]. 2017;76:299–312. Available from: [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28431180](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28431180) 28. 28.Kivipelto M, Helkala EL, Laakso MP, Hanninen T, Hallikainen M, Alhainen K, et al. Midlife vascular risk factors and Alzheimer’s disease in later life: longitudinal, population based study. BMJ. 2001;322:1447–51. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEzOiIzMjIvNzMwMC8xNDQ3IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjAvMTEvMzAvMjAyMC4xMS4zMC4yMDI0MDg3OS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 29. 29.Moonga I, Niccolini F, Wilson H, Pagano G, Politis M. Hypertension is associated with worse cognitive function and hippocampal hypometabolism in Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Neurol. 2017;24:1173–82. 30. 30.Royea J, Zhang L, Tong XK, Hamel E. Angiotensin IV receptors mediate the cognitive and cerebrovascular benefits of losartan in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci. 2017;37:5562–73. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6Njoiam5ldXJvIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiIzNy8yMi81NTYyIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjAvMTEvMzAvMjAyMC4xMS4zMC4yMDI0MDg3OS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 31. 31.Kume K, Hanyu H, Sakurai H, Takada Y, Onuma T, Iwamoto T. Effects of telmisartan on cognition and regional cerebral blood flow in hypertensive patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Geriatr Gerontol Int [Internet]. 2012;12:207–14. Available from: [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21929736](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21929736) 32. 32. Jack Jr. Cr, Lowe VJ, Weigand SD, Wiste HJ, Senjem ML, Knopman DS, et al. Serial PIB and MRI in normal, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: implications for sequence of pathological events in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2009;132:1355–65. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/brain/awp062&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19339253&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.30.20240879.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000265950900023&link_type=ISI) 33. 33.Hua X, Hibar DP, Lee S, Toga AW, Jack CR, Weiner MW, et al. Sex and age differences in atrophic rates: an ADNI study with n=1368 MRI scans. Neurobiol Aging [Internet]. 2010;31:1463–80. Available from: [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20620666](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20620666) 34. 34. Jack Jr. Cr, Shiung MM, Weigand SD, O’Brien PC, Gunter JL, Boeve BF, et al. Brain atrophy rates predict subsequent clinical conversion in normal elderly and amnestic MCI. Neurology. 2005;65:1227–31. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1212/01.wnl.0000180958.22678.91&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16247049&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.30.20240879.atom) 35. 35. Jack Jr. Cr, Weigand SD, Shiung MM, Przybelski SA, O’Brien PC, Gunter JL, et al. Atrophy Rates Accelerate in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment. Neurology. 2008;70:1740–52. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1212/01.wnl.0000281688.77598.35&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18032747&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2F2020.11.30.20240879.atom)