Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Diabetic COVID-19 patients in Kuwait ============================================================================= * Abdullah Alshukry * Mohammad Bu Abbas * Yaseen Ali * Barrak Alahmad * Abdullah A. Al-Shammari * Mohammad Abu-Farha * Jehad AbuBaker * Sriraman Devarajan * Ali A. Dashti * Fahd Al-Mulla * Hamad Ali ## Abstract **Background** COVID-19 has a highly variable clinical presentation, ranging from asymptomatic to severe respiratory symptoms and death. Diabetes seems to be one of the main comorbidities contributing to a worse COVID-19 outcome. **Objective** In here we analyze the clinical characteristics and outcomes of diabetic COVID-19 patients. **Methods** In this single-center, retrospective study of 417 consecutive COVID-19 patients, we analyze and compare disease severity, outcome, associated complications, and clinical laboratory findings between diabetic and non-diabetic COVID-19 patients. **Results** COVID-19 patients with diabetes had more severe outcomes and higher mortality than non-diabetic COVID-19 patients. Diabetic COVID-19 patients had significantly higher prevalence of comorbidities, such as hypertension. Laboratory investigations also highlighted notably higher levels of C-reactive protein in diabetic COVID019 patients and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate. They also showed a higher incidence of complications. **Conclusion** Diabetes could be a major contributor to worsening outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Understanding the pathophysiology underlining these findings could provide insight into better management and improved outcome of such cases. **Highlights of the Study** * A significantly higher proportion of Diabetic COVID-19 patients required admission to the ICU. * Higher fasting blood glucose was associated with higher risk of COVID-19 associated mortality. * Diabetic COVID-19 patients had significantly higher incidence of complications including sepsis, ARDS, cardiac failure and renal failure. Keywords * COVID-19 * Diabetes Mellitus * SARS-CoV2 * inflammation * CRP ## 1. Introduction In December 2019, a novel coronavirus, now known as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), emerged in Wuhan, China1. Since then, it has spread rapidly all over the world and was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020. With the number of cases currently reaching 22 million and more than 800,000 deaths, the virus poses a major threat to global health2, 3. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), the disease caused by the virus, has shown a highly variable clinical presentation, ranging from asymptomatic to severe illness leading to death. The symptoms of COVID-19 include fever, cough, dyspnea, myalgia, fatigue, headache, and loss of taste or smell. Most patients experience mild symptoms, although some may develop serious complications, including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multiorgan failure, septic shock, and hypercoagulation, which can eventually lead to death4-8. The exact reasons for the observed variability in disease manifestations and outcomes are not fully understood. Whereas pediatric cases show a milder clinical course9, a worse prognosis has been associated with older age and being male8. Emerging evidence also indicates that preexisting medical conditions, including hypertension, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, solid organ transplantation, and diabetes, can increase the risk of poor COVID-19 prognosis10-13. Diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disease characterized by the occurrence of hyperglycemia for a prolonged period. It is associated with serious long-term complications, including cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease 14. Diabetes, which affects 463 million people, has a major impact on global health. It is among the top 10 causes of adult deaths worldwide15. In the past two decades, two coronaviruses have emerged that have caused widespread respiratory illness and deaths. In 2002, SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV) emerged in China, causing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. In 2012, another coronavirus, MERS-coronavirus (MERS-CoV), emerged in Saudi Arabia, causing Middle East respiratory syndrome. Experience with both syndromes revealed that diabetes was a risk factor for poor prognosis and mortality16, 17. Similarly, initial reports of the clinical characteristics of COVID-19 showed a similar trend1, 8, 18. Given the global burden of diabetes and the pandemic course of SARS-CoV-2, understanding how diabetes contributes to a worse COVID-19 prognosis is important. Several studies have shown that type 2 diabetes, which is the most prevalent type of the disease, is associated with low-grade chronic inflammation that affects the homeostatic glucose regulation and insulin sensitivity. The combination of chronic inflammation and hyperglycemia could contribute to an abnormal immune response by weakening T-cell function, in addition to an increased risk of hyperinflammation and cytokine storm syndrome19, 20, which in turn can worsen the COVID-19 disease outcome. Understanding how diabetes worsens COVID-19 outcomes can help provide better disease management and contribute to the improvement in disease outcomes. In this study, we perform a comprehensive clinical analysis of COVID-19 patients with and without type 2 diabetes. We analyze and compare the distribution of disease severity, associated complications, and death outcomes between the two groups. ## 2. Subjects and Methods ### 2.1 Study design The Standing Committee for Coordination of Health and Medical Research at the Ministry of Health in Kuwait reviewed and approved this retrospective study (Institutional Review Board 2020/1404). The Standing Committee waived the requirement for written informed consent because of the urgency of data collection and the exceptional nature of the disease. All procedures involving human participants were performed following the relevant guidelines and regulations. The medical records of confirmed COVID-19 cases admitted to Jaber Al-Ahmad Hospital in Kuwait between February 24 and May 24, 2020, were accessed, analyzed, and included in this study. The diagnosis of COVID-19 was established based on positive viral real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay of nasal and/or pharyngeal swabs, following the World Health Organization’s interim guidance. Cases were divided into two main groups: patients with diabetes and patients without diabetes. The diagnosis of diabetes was based on a fasting plasma glucose value of ≥7.0 mmol/L 21. Only type 2 diabetes patients were considered in this study as no type 1 diabetes patients were encoutnered. Laboratry diagnosis was confirmed with medical history. Each group was further divided into the following subgroups depending on COVID-19 severity and outcome: asymptomatic, symptomatic with mild/moderate symptoms, intensive care unit (ICU) survivors, and ICU death. Data presented in this study was made available on springer nature data depository22 and can be accessed via [https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12567881.v1](https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12567881.v1). ### 2.2 Data collection We included 417 confirmed COVID-19 patients in the study. The patients’ medical records were accessed and analyzed by our team at Dasman Diabetes Institute, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences at Kuwait University, and Jaber Al-Ahmad Hospital. We obtained and analyzed demographic data, medical history, including underlying comorbidities, travel history, contact tracing data, clinical chemistry, hematological laboratory findings, chest radiological images, treatments, complications, ICU admissions and durations, and dynamics of hospital stay and outcomes. The diagnosis of ARDS was determined based on the Berlin definition23. Acute kidney injury was evaluated following the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes definition24. The presence of cardiac injury was established based on cardiac blood markers, electrocardiography, and/or echocardiography7. ### 2.3 Hospitalization dynamics During the patient recruitment period, Jaber Al-Ahmad Hospital by the Ministry of Health instituted a 100% hospitalization policy for COVID-19–positive cases. All cases with a positive RT-PCR test, including asymptomatic cases, were admitted, isolated, and put under medical surveillance. Patients in the mild/moderate group, who were hemodynamically stable and had no signs of respiratory distress, were admitted to the ward after RT-PCR confirmation for isolation, medical surveillance, and reevaluation. Patients were transferred to the ICU if they developed signs of respiratory distress and desaturation of oxygen levels (confirmed by pulse oximetry and arterial blood gases) and/or signs of hemodynamic instability that required close monitoring and intensive re-establishment of homeostasis. Patients with severe to critical COVID-19 symptoms were admitted directly to the ICU if they matched any of the following criteria of severity: hypoxemic respiratory failure requiring respiratory support, such as patients who developed ARDS; hemodynamic instability due to cardiogenic or septic shock and clinical, radiological, or laboratory evidence of heart failure; acute cardiac injury; and acute kidney injury secondary to COVID-19 manifestations. ### 2.4 Statistical analysis The variables analyzed in the study were divided into categorical and continuous variables. The categorical variables were described as frequencies and percentages, whereas continuous variables were presented as medians and interquartile ranges and means and standard deviations. We used a one-way analysis of variance to compare means between groups; we used the Kruskal–Wallis H test to compare the medians of the different group laboratory parameters. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test, and when the data were limited, Fisher exact test was used. The differences between group means and medians were considered statistically significant when *p* < 0.05. We investigated the relationship between fasting blood glucose as a continuous exposure and ICU admission as an outcome from COVID-19 as a binary response and adjusted to other covariates (age, gender, smoking status, diabetes status, and other comorbidities). We employed a logistic regression model and reported the odds ratios of the outcome of dying from COVID-19 for each 1 mmol/L increase in fasting blood glucose. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software (La Jolla, CA, USA), SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) for Windows version 25.0 (IBM SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and R version 3.4.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). ## 3. Results ### 3.1 Cohort characteristics The studied cohort consisted of 417 COVID-19 patients who were divided into two groups based on fasting blood glucose levels: 273 (65.5%) non-diabetic patients and 122 (29.3%) diabetic patients (Table 1). The mean age of the non-diabetic group was 39.55 (± 16.59) years, whereas the mean age of the diabetic group was 56.44 (± 11.64) years (*p* < 0.001, Student *t*-test; Table 1 and supplemantry Figure 1). The diabetic group had a greater incidence of fever, shortness of breath, and fatigue than the non-diabetic group (*p* < 0.05, < 0.001, and < 0.05, respectively). However, the differences in other symptoms were not significant between the two groups (Table 1). View this table: [Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/11/2020.08.20.20178525/T1) Table 1. Cohort characteristics stratified by diabetic status The diabetic group had a higher prevalence of comorbidities including hypertension, asthma, cardiovascular disease, and chronic renal disease (*p* < 0.001, < 0.05, < 0.001, and < 0.005, respectively; Table 1). ### 3.2 COVID-19 severity, outcome, and associated complications In terms of COVID-19 severity, we found no statistically significant difference in the percentages of asymptomatic and mild-moderate cases between the diabetic and non-diabetic groups (Table 2). However, the diabetic group included a significantly higher proportion of patients requiring admission to the ICU (*p* < 0.001). Without adjustment, the diabetes group had a significantly higher percentage of death as compared with the non-diabetic group (16.7% vs. 12.1%, *p* < 0.001; Table 2). The diabetic group also had a significantly higher prevalence of complications, including sepsis, ARDS, cardiovascular disease, heart failure, and kidney injury when compared with the non-diabetic group (*p* < 0.001; Table 2). View this table: [Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/11/2020.08.20.20178525/T2) Table 2. COVID-19 severity, outcome and associated complications among diabetics and non-diabetics ### 3.3 Fasting blood glucose level and odds ratio of death We used a logistic regression model and reported the odds ratios of the outcome of dying from COVID-19 for each 1-mmol/L increase in fasting blood glucose. We found that every 1 mmol/L increase in fasting glucose is associated with 1.52 (95% CI: 1.34 – 1.72, p<0.001) times the odds of dying from COVID-19. ### 3.4 Clinical biochemistry findings The diabetic and non-diabetic groups were subdivided into asymptomatic, mild-moderate, and severe categories. The clinical biochemistry findings were compared between the patients with and without diabetes in the subcategories of COVID-19 severity (Table 3). The cohort was categorized and divided according to the fasting blood glucose level. We noted a significant difference in fasting blood glucose between the diabetic and non-diabetic groups across all subcategories. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was significantly lower in the diabetic group than the non-diabetic group in all subcategories. The lowest value was in the severe group (57.50 ± 33.81 vs. 76.46 ± 34.14 mL/min/1.73 m2, *p* < 0.05). The other renal markers, creatinine and urea, were higher in general in the diabetic groups than the non-diabetic groups. However, the results were significant only in the severe subcategory (*p* < 0.05 for both markers). The C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher among diabetic patients than non-diabetic patients in all subcategories (*p* < 0.05, < 0.05, and < 0.005, in order; Table 3). Although procalcitonin levels were higher in all diabetic groups, the difference was not statistically significant. The albumin level was significantly lower in the diabetic groups across all subcategories than the non-diabetic groups (*p* < 0.001, < 0.001, and < 0.05, in order). White blood cell counts and neutrophil counts were significantly higher in the diabetic group in the severe subcategory as compared with the non-diabetic group (*p* < 0.05 and < 0.005, respectively; Table 3). View this table: [Table 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/11/2020.08.20.20178525/T3) Table 3. Clinical biochemistry findings per group stratified by diabetic status ## 4. Discussion COVID-19 has displayed a broad spectrum of severity, ranging from asymptomatic to severe illness leading to death. Many factors have influence disease outcome, including age and gender. Severe outcomes have been associated with preexisting chronic illnesses, such as hypertension and diabetes. In this study, we presented the clinical characteristics and outcomes of diabetic COVID-19 patients in Kuwait. In general, we found that patients with diabetes had more severe COVID-19 outcomes than patients without diabetes, represented by the higher proportion of ICU admitted cases (severe) and deaths (Table 2). Our results are in agreement with the findings obtained from a Chinese COVID-19 cohort, in which COVID-19 diabetic patients had a 7.3% increased risk of mortality compared with 2.3% for the general population25. Moreover, a British cohort showed that COVID-19 patients with uncontrolled diabetes had a higher risk of death than other patients did26. The reason why individuals with diabetes are likely to have a worse COVID-19 prognosis seems to be multifactorial because of the syndromic nature of diabetes. In our cohort, we found that diabetic patients were older, had a higher prevalence of comorbidities, such as hypertension, had higher levels of inflammatory markers, had a lower eGFR, and had a higher prevalence of complications, all of which lead to worse COVID-19 outcomes (Figure 1; Tables 1– 3). Such findings indicate the possible multifaceted pathological mechanistic pathways that lead to worse outcomes in COVID-19 diabetic patients. Inflammation plays a critical role in diabetes pathogenesis, whereby diabetic patients typically develop a chronic state of inflammation27. We found significantly higher levels of C-reactive protein in all of our COVID-19 diabetic patients than non-diabetic COVID-19 patients (Table 3). This finding could be associated with an inflammatory status that makes these patients more susceptible to the damaging effects of what is known as the COVID-19 cytokine storm, which leads to multiorgan failure and death28. The higher prevalence of comorbidities in diabetic patients can also contribute to their poor COVID-19 outcomes. Among the diabetic patients in this study, we noted a higher prevalence of hypertension and cardiovascular disease (57.6% and 14.1%, respectively) compared with the non-diabetic patients (14.7% and 4.4,% respectively; Table 1). Such results agree with the findings reported in a study conducted in Wuhan, China (56.9% and 20.9%, respectively)29. We also noted a significantly lower eGFR upon admission for diabetic patients as compared with non-diabetic individuals (Table 3). This finding coincided with a higher incidence of acute kidney injury among diabetic patients than non-diabetic patients (24.3% and 2.2%, respectively, *p* < 0.001; Table 2). Diabetic patients have a higher risk of developing chronic kidney disease, which can eventually lead to kidney failure. The situation is worse in diabetic COVID-19 patients, because SARS-CoV-2 is likely to target the kidney through an angiotensin-converting enzyme 2– dependent pathway, leading to renal impairment and death30. Our logistic regression model showed a positive correlation between fasting blood glucose levels and increased risk of COVID-19 death, with adjustment for other risk factors including age, gender, smoking status, and other comorbidities. This finding might suggest that elevated glucose levels could be the primary molecular trigger for a cascade of pathological events that contribute to the poor outcome associated with COVID-19 in diabetic patients. One of the major limitations of this study was the lack of BMI cohort data. Adiposity could be a strong predictor in such settings. ## 5. Conclusion In conclusion, diabetes is one of the major risk factors associated with the poor outcome and mortality of COVID-19 patients. COVID-19 patients with diabetes have a higher prevalence of comorbidities such as hypertension, higher levels of inflammatory markers, lower eGFR, and a higher incidence of in-hospital complications, which illustrates the possible multifaceted pathological mechanistic pathways triggered by hyperglycemia that lead to worse outcomes and mortality. ## Data Availability Data presented in this study was made available on springer nature data depository. [https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12567881.v1](https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12567881.v1). ## Authors contributions AA1 was involved in acquisition of data. MB was involved in acquisition of data. YA was involved in acquisition of data. BA was involved in data analysis. AA2, was involved in data analysis. MA was involved in revision of article for important intellectual conent. JA was involved in revision of article for important intellectual conent. SD was involved in data analysis. AD wa involved in data interpretation. FA was involved in critical revision of article for important intellectual conent and data interpretation. HA was involved in the conception and design of the study, data analysis and interpretation, drafting the article and took the final approval of the version submitted. All authors have approved the final version of article. ## Conflict of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. All co-authors have seen and agree with the contents of the manuscript and there is no financial interest to report. ## Funding No funding was obtained for the presented work. ## Supplemantary ![Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2020/10/11/2020.08.20.20178525/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/11/2020.08.20.20178525/F1) Figure 1. Cohort age structure stratified by diabetes status. **On average**, non-diabetic group had a mean age of 39.55 (± 16.59) years while diabetic group had a mean age of 56.44 (± 11.64) years (p-value <0.001, student’s T test). ## Acknowledgments We would like to thank the adminstation of Jaber Al-Ahmad hospital for facilitating and supporting this work. * Received August 20, 2020. * Revision received October 11, 2020. * Accepted October 11, 2020. * © 2020, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ## 6. References 1. 1.Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223): 497–506. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F10%2F11%2F2020.08.20.20178525.atom) 2. 2.Dong E, Du H, Gardner L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020. 3. 3.Al-Shammari AAA, Ali H, Al-Ahmad B, et al. Real-time tracking and forecasting of the COVID-19 outbreak in Kuwait: a mathematical modeling study. medRxiv. 2020: doi:2020.2005.2003.20089771. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=2020.2005.2003.20089771&link_type=DOI) 4. 4.Bai Y, Yao L, Wei T, et al. Presumed Asymptomatic Carrier Transmission of COVID-19. JAMA. 2020. 5. 5.Lai CC, Liu YH, Wang CY, et al. Asymptomatic carrier state, acute respiratory disease, and pneumonia due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): Facts and myths. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2020. 6. 6.Wu F, Zhao S, Yu B, et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature. 2020;579(7798): 265–269. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F10%2F11%2F2020.08.20.20178525.atom) 7. 7.Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, et al. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020. 8. 8.Alshukry A, Ali H, Ali Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in Kuwait. medRxiv. 2020: doi:2020.2006.2014.20131045. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=2020.2006.2014.20131045&link_type=DOI) 9. 9.Lu X, Zhang L, Du H, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Children. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(17): 1663–1665. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMc2005073&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F10%2F11%2F2020.08.20.20178525.atom) 10. 10.Williamson E, Walker AJ, Bhaskaran KJ, et al. OpenSAFELY: factors associated with COVID-19-related hospital death in the linked electronic health records of 17 million adult NHS patients. medRxiv. 2020: doi:2020.2005.2006.20092999. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=2020.2005.2006.20092999&link_type=DOI) 11. 11.Guo T, Fan Y, Chen M, et al. Cardiovascular Implications of Fatal Outcomes of Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020. 12. 12.Yang J, Zheng Y, Gou X, et al. Prevalence of comorbidities and its effects in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;94: 91–95. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.017&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F10%2F11%2F2020.08.20.20178525.atom) 13. 13.Zheng Z, Peng F, Xu B, et al. Risk factors of critical & mortal COVID-19 cases: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Infect. 2020. 14. 14.Forbes JM, Cooper ME. Mechanisms of diabetic complications. Physiol Rev. 2013;93(1): 137-188. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1152/physrev.00045.2011&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23303908&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F10%2F11%2F2020.08.20.20178525.atom) 15. 15.Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9(th) edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;157: 107843. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F10%2F11%2F2020.08.20.20178525.atom) 16. 16.Badawi A, Ryoo SG. Prevalence of comorbidities in the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2016;49: 129–133. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ijid.2016.06.015&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F10%2F11%2F2020.08.20.20178525.atom) 17. 17.Yang JK, Feng Y, Yuan MY, et al. Plasma glucose levels and diabetes are independent predictors for mortality and morbidity in patients with SARS. Diabet Med. 2006;23(6): 623–628. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01861.x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16759303&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F10%2F11%2F2020.08.20.20178525.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000238761300005&link_type=ISI) 18. 18.Petrosillo N, Viceconte G, Ergonul O, Ippolito G, Petersen E. COVID-19, SARS and MERS: are they closely related? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26(6): 729–734. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/14651858.CD013582&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32315451&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F10%2F11%2F2020.08.20.20178525.atom) 19. 19.Iacobellis G. COVID-19 and diabetes: Can DPP4 inhibition play a role? Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020;162: 108125. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108125&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F10%2F11%2F2020.08.20.20178525.atom) 20. 20.de Lucena TMC, da Silva Santos AF, de Lima BR, de Albuquerque Borborema ME, de Azevedo Silva J. Mechanism of inflammatory response in associated comorbidities in COVID-19. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(4): 597–600. 21. 21.American Diabetes A. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(Suppl 1): S14–S31. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxOToiNDMvU3VwcGxlbWVudF8xL1MxNCI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIwLzEwLzExLzIwMjAuMDguMjAuMjAxNzg1MjUuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 22. 22.Abdullah A, Hamad A, Yaseen A, et al. Data underlying the manuscript: Clinical characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in Kuwait2020. 23. 23.Force ADT, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012;307(23): 2526–2533. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.2012.5669&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22797452&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F10%2F11%2F2020.08.20.20178525.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000305391400029&link_type=ISI) 24. 24.Levey AS, Eckardt KU, Tsukamoto Y, et al. Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: a position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int. 2005;67(6): 2089–2100. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00365.x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15882252&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F10%2F11%2F2020.08.20.20178525.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000229384300001&link_type=ISI) 25. 25.Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020. 26. 26.Williamson EJ, Walker AJ, Bhaskaran K, et al. OpenSAFELY: factors associated with COVID-19 death in 17 million patients. Nature. 2020. 27. 27.Donath MY, Shoelson SE. Type 2 diabetes as an inflammatory disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11(2): 98–107. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/nri2925&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21233852&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F10%2F11%2F2020.08.20.20178525.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000286589300014&link_type=ISI) 28. 28.Mancia G, Rea F, Ludergnani M, Apolone G, Corrao G. Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Blockers and the Risk of Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(25): 2431–2440. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMoa2006923&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F10%2F11%2F2020.08.20.20178525.atom) 29. 29.Shi Q, Zhang X, Jiang F, et al. Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors for Mortality of COVID-19 Patients With Diabetes in Wuhan, China: A Two-Center, Retrospective Study. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(7): 1382–1391. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo5OiI0My83LzEzODIiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMC8xMC8xMS8yMDIwLjA4LjIwLjIwMTc4NTI1LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 30. 30.Zhang YM, Zhang H. Genetic Roadmap for Kidney Involvement of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;15(7): 1044–1046. [FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiRlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6ODoiY2xpbmphc24iO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6OToiMTUvNy8xMDQ0IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjAvMTAvMTEvMjAyMC4wOC4yMC4yMDE3ODUyNS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=)