Abstract
Objectives: During the COVID-19 pandemic, NHS staff support services aimed to support healthcare workers (HCWs) wellbeing, alongside informal support from colleagues and managers. However, bullying, harassment, and discrimination against HCWs from ethnic minority and migrant groups, along with low wellbeing support uptake, suggest disparities in workplace support. This study aimed to address the following research questions: 1) How does support programme use vary by ethnicity and migration status? 2) How does the perception of support from managers and colleagues vary by ethnicity and migration status? Methods: This study analysed NHS CHECK survey data which examined the mental health and occupational outcomes (including support use) of HCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic across 18 Trusts in England. Data from 9,769 participants who completed the baseline survey (launched April 2020) and the six-month follow-up was analysed using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression. Results: HCWs from White Other (AOR 0.79; CI 0.64-0.99) and Asian ethnic groups (AOR 0.65; CI 0.57-0.74) were less likely to feel supported by their colleagues than White British HCWs. Similarly, those born outside of the UK and EU were less likely to feel supported by their colleagues than UK-born HCWs (AOR 0.70; CI 0.52-0.94). No variations in support programme use or support from managers were found across ethnicity or migration status. Conclusions: The study suggests equitable formal support but identified critical disparities in perceived collegial support for HCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Improving workplace wellbeing should address the underlying social and structural factors that influence peer support and belonging.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by Wellcome [203380/Z/16/Z] and the Economic and Social Research Council [ES/V009931/1]. CW RR and SLH are supported by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Centre for Society and Mental Health at Kings College London (ESRC Reference: ES/S012567/1). JO is also part supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Kings College London. RR would like to acknowledge funding from the Medical Research Council (MR/W021277/1). SAMS is supported by the NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and funded by the NIHR via an NIHR Advanced Fellowship (ref NIHR300592). DL is supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaborative North Thames. The NHS CHECK study is supported by the Medical Research Council (MR/V034405/1) UCL/Wellcome (ISSF3/ H17RCO/C3) Rosetrees (M952) NHS England and Improvement; Economic and Social Research Council (ES/V009931/1) as well as seed funding from Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre Kings College London NIHR Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response at Kings College London. The funders had no involvement in study design data collection analysis interpretation or the decision to submit for publication. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the funders the National Institute for Health Research or the Department for Health or Social Care.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This project is a secondary data analysis using data from the NHS CHECK Study and the Inequalities survey. Ethical approval for the NHS CHECK study was granted by the Health Research Authority (reference: 20/HRA/2107, IRAS: 282686).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Paper in collection COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 preprints from medRxiv and bioRxiv
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos