Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL) remains a significant public health concern with notable disparities in survival outcomes. Sex and marital status are two critical social determinants that influence both cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Prior studies suggest that women with NHL face poorer survival outcomes compared to men, and marital status modulates survival, with married individuals demonstrating better outcomes. However, the interplay between sex and marital status on NHL survival has not been thoroughly examined. Objective: To investigate the combined effects of sex and marital status on CSS and OS in NHL patients. Methodology: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using SEER registry data spanning 2000 to 2020. Individuals aged 18–85 diagnosed with NHL were included. Cox regression models assessed the interaction between sex and marital status on CSS and OS, adjusting for covariates such as age, race, household income, cancer stage, and treatment modalities. Predicted probabilities of mortality and the differences in sex effects across marital status categories were estimated using interaction terms and linear combinations. Results: A total of 291,608 patients were included, with females accounting for 54.6% of the cohort. Sex disparities were observed across marital status groups. Married women exhibited a significantly higher probability of overall mortality than married men (9.26, 95% CI: 7.61–10.92, p < 0.001). The disparity was most pronounced among single individuals, where women had a 22.93-unit higher probability of overall mortality compared to men (95% CI: 18.49–27.37, p < 0.001). Similarly, widowed women had higher probabilities of mortality than widowed men (13.10, 95% CI: 10.08–16.11, p < 0.001). Cancer-specific mortality followed a similar pattern, with single women experiencing the greatest disparity compared to single men (8.44, 95% CI: 6.21–10.68, p < 0.001). Comparisons of effects between marital status groups revealed that single individuals exhibited a 13.67-unit greater disparity in overall mortality than married individuals (95% CI: 10.26–17.07, p < 0.001). Conclusion: This study underscores the significant influence of sex and marital status on survival outcomes in NHL patients. Women face higher cancer-specific and overall mortality risks across all marital status categories. Marital status modifies these disparities, with marriage conferring a survival advantage, particularly for men. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to address sex and social disparities in NHL outcomes, emphasizing the importance of social support and tailored survivorship care.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The SEER registry provided de-identified data therefore, informed consent or IRB approval was not required.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos