Abstract
Background In Alzheimer’s disease (AD) clinical trials, efficacy inference is traditionally based on the last visit (e.g., 18 months). However, recent studies suggest that disease-modifying treatment effects may emerge as early as 3 months post-baseline.
Objective To explore this further, our study aimed to assess the increased statistical power achieved by incorporating all or multiple post-baseline visits to estimate treatment effect, compared to relying solely on the last visit.
Methods We developed explicit formulas for the base functions of the natural cubic spline model, ensuring compatibility with standard SAS procedures. Through simulations using disease progression trajectories from ClarityAD and TRAILBLAZER-ALZ2 trials, we comprehensively evaluated various models in terms of power and type I error. Additionally, we offer SAS codes that to facilitate seamless implementation of different modeling approaches.
Results Simulations based on ClarityAD and TRAILBLAZER-ALZ2 disease trajectories demonstrated that models incorporating multiple or all post-baseline visits yield greater power than those using only the last visit, while maintaining Type I error control. Furthermore, when three post-baseline visits were included, adding more visits resulted in minimal power gains.
Conclusions Our findings support prioritizing statistical models that incorporate multiple or all post-baseline visits for treatment efficacy inference, as they offer greater efficiency than models relying solely on the last visit.
Competing Interest Statement
Guoqiao Wang, PhD, is the biostatistics core co-leader for the DIAN-TU. He reports serving on a Data Safety Committee for Amydis Corporate, Abata Therapeutics, and statistical consultant for Eisai inc. and Alector Inc. Eric McDade, D.O., is the Associate Director of the DIAN-TU. He reports serving on a Data Safety Committee for Eli Lilly and Company and Alector; scientific consultant for Eisai and Eli Lilly and Company; institutional grant support from Eli Lilly and Company, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd. and Janssen. Randall J. Bateman, M.D., is the Director of the DIAN-TU and Principal Investigator of the DIAN-TU-001. He co-founded C2N Diagnostics. Washington University and R.J.B. have equity ownership interest in C2N Diagnostics and receive royalty income based on technology (stable isotope labeling kinetics, blood plasma assay and methods of diagnosing Alzheimer disease with phosphorylation changes) that is licensed by Washington University to C2N Diagnostics. R.J.B. receives income from C2N Diagnostics for serving on the scientific advisory board. R.J.B. has received research funding from Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Janssen, Roche/Genentech, Eli Lilly, Eisai, Biogen, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis. He receives research support from the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health, DIAN-TU Trial Pharmaceutical Partners (Eli Lilly and Company, F. Hoffman-La Roche, Ltd., and Avid Radiopharmaceuticals), Alzheimers Association, GHR Foundation, Anonymous Organization, DIAN-TU Pharma Consortium (Active: Biogen, Eisai, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd./Genentech. Previous: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Forum, Mithridion, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, United Neuroscience). He has been an invited speaker for Novartis and serves on the Advisory Board for F. Hoffman La Roche, Ltd. All the other authors reported no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers, 1R21AG08405401, U01AG042791, U01AG042791-S1 (FNIH and Accelerating Medicines Partnership), R01AG046179, R01AG053267, R01AG053267-S1, R01AG068319, and 1U01AG059798. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵□ Work was done while employed by Biogen Inc.
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos