ABSTRACT
HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is underutilized in the United States. Emergency Departments (EDs) can be strategic locations for initiating PrEP; however, knowledge concerning patients’ receptivity to ED PrEP programs is limited. This study explores ED patients’ perspectives on PrEP service delivery and their preferences for implementation. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 15 potentially PrEP-eligible ED patients to examine their receptiveness to PrEP services, preferences for delivery methods, and logistical considerations. Most participants were open to learning about PrEP in the ED, provided it did not delay care, occur during distress, or compromise privacy. Universal PrEP education was viewed as reducing stigma and increasing awareness, while targeted screening was seen as efficient. Participants strongly preferred receiving information in person rather than via videos or pamphlets. Concerns included ensuring ED staff expertise and maintaining privacy during PrEP-related discussions. Regarding same-day PrEP versus prescriptions or referrals, opinions varied, with participants valuing flexibility and linkage to care. This first qualitative study of ED patients’ perspectives on PrEP services highlights general receptiveness, with key concerns about privacy, expertise, and wait times. Patient-centered approaches, including integrating PrEP services into ED workflows, offering flexible initiation options, and providing privacy, can support the feasibility of ED-based PrEP programs.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported in part through the computational and data resources and staff expertise provided by Scientific Computing and Data at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and supported by the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) grant UL1TR004419 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. Grant funding: -National Institute of Mental Health P30MH043520-33S2 (HIV Center Administrative Supplement. Designing Differentiated PrEP Service Delivery Models for Implementation in New York City Emergency Departments through a Community Collaborative (PI: Robert H. Remien, PhD; Supplement PD: Susie Hoffman, DrPH) -National Institute of Mental Health K23MH136923-01 (PI: Rachel Solnick, MD MSc)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine-Montefiore Medical Center (IRB #2021-13676), the Mount Sinai Health System (STUDY-21-01811), and the New York State Psychiatric Institute/Columbia University Department of Psychiatry (IRB #8239).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.