Abstract
IMPORTANCE Prior studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in children and adolescents. However, the benefits of vaccination in these age groups with prior infection remain underexplored.
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in preventing reinfection with various Omicron subvariants (BA.1/2, BA.4/5, XBB, and later) among 5- to 17-year-olds with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.
DESIGN A target trial emulation through nested designs with distinct study periods.
SETTING The study utilized data from the Research COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) initiative, a national electronic health record (EHR) database comprising 37 U.S. children’s hospitals and health institutions.
PARTICIPANTS Individuals aged 5-17 years with a documented history of SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to the study start date during a specific variant-dominant period (Delta, BA.1/2, or BA.4/5) who received a subsequent dose of COVID-19 vaccine during the study periods were compared with those with a documented history of infection who did not receive SARS-CoV-2 vaccine during the study period. Those infected within the Delta-Omicron composite period (December 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021) were excluded. The study period was from January 1, 2022, to August 30, 2023, and focused on adolescents aged 12 to 17 years and children aged 5 to 11 years.
EXPOSURES At least received one COVID-19 vaccination during the study period vs. no receipt of any COVID-19 vaccine during the study period.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome is documented SARS-CoV-2 reinfection during the study period (both asymptomatic and symptomatic cases). The effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine was estimated as (1-hazard ratio) *100%, with confounders adjusted by a combination of propensity score matching and exact matching.
RESULTS The study analyzed 87,573 participants during the BA.1/2 period, 229,326 during the BA.4/5 period, and 282,981 during the XBB or later period. Among vaccinated individuals, significant protection was observed during the BA.1/2 period, with effectiveness rates of 62% (95% CI: 38%-77%) for children and 65% (95% CI: 32%-81%) for adolescents. During the BA.4/5 period, vaccine effectiveness was 57% (95% CI: 25%-76%) for children, but not statistically significant for adolescents (36%, 95% CI: −16%-65%). For the XBB period, no significant protection was observed in either group, with effectiveness rates of 22% (95% CI: −36%-56%) in children and 34% (95% CI: −10%-61%) in adolescents.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE COVID-19 vaccination provides significant protection against reinfection for children and adolescents with prior infections during the early and mid-Omicron periods. This study also highlights the importance of addressing low vaccination rates in pediatric populations to enhance protection against emerging variants.
Question Does COVID-19 vaccination protect against reinfection with Omicron subvariants (BA.1/2, BA.4/5, XBB, and later) among children and adolescents aged 5-17 years with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection?
Findings COVID-19 vaccination significantly reduced the risk of reinfection during the BA.1/2 period, with effectiveness rates of 62% in children and 65% in adolescents. During the BA.4/5 period, vaccination provided moderate protection in children, with effectiveness rates of 57%, but the effectiveness in adolescents (36%) was not statistically significant. For the XBB period and later subvariants, vaccination did not show significant protection in either group.
Meaning COVID-19 vaccination offered meaningful protection against reinfection in pediatric populations during earlier Omicron periods but became less effective with later emerging subvariants, highlighting the challenges of sustaining vaccine effectiveness as the virus continues to evolve.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health (OT2HL161847-01, 1R01LM014344, 1R01AG077820, R01LM012607, R01AI130460, R01AG073435, R56AG074604, R01LM013519, R56AG069880, U01TR003709, RF1AG077820, R21AI167418, R21EY034179).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of UPENN waived ethical approval for this study, as the data used were de-identified and obtained under appropriate ethical and regulatory guidelines.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Paper in collection COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 preprints from medRxiv and bioRxiv
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos