Abstract
While fostering equity, diversity, and inclusion in the workplace is crucial for many reasons, in public health research, diverse perspectives are particularly vital to identify biases that homogenous teams might miss. Given that publication metrics often influence career progression, we investigated gender and ethnic disparities in publication rates within Imperial College London’s School of Public Health.
We analysed 18,322 peer-reviewed publications by 513 affiliated researchers between 2014 and 2023. We used mixed-effects multivariable regression models to assess the impact of gender, ethnicity, and job level on publication rates. Network analysis of co-authorships was performed to evaluate each author’s centrality in the department’s research network.
We found a persistent gender gap in publication rates across all job levels and ethnicities, with men publishing more than women (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.30 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.15 – 1.46). This disparity was present from early career levels and amplified in senior roles, where men were overrepresented (71.2% of men at Professor level). Internal collaboration rates were similar between genders.
Unadjusted analyses indicated higher publication rates for white researchers (median of 1 publication more per person per year), although there were limitations in the ethnicity classification algorithm.
The COVID-19 pandemic led to increased publication rates for both genders, but the gender gap persisted, with men publishing 1.27 (95% CI: 1.10 – 1.46) times more than women in 2020 - 2021. A complex interplay of factors may contribute to publication disparities, including differences in research contributions, systemic barriers, and potential biases in research allocation, mentorship, and promotion processes.
This study underscores the need to identify and address the root causes of these disparities to foster an inclusive research environment where diverse contributions are recognized and valued.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors acknowledge funding for this project from Imperial College London's School of Public Health, the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Modelling and Health Economics, a partnership between the UK Health Security Agency, Imperial College London and LSHTM (grant code NIHR200908) and the MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis (reference MR/X020258/1), funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC). This UK funded award is carried out in the frame of the Global Health EDCTP3 Joint Undertaking. Disclaimer: The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR, UK Health Security Agency or the Department of Health and Social Care. LCO acknowledges funding from the UK Royal Society. SEQ acknowledges funding from the Wellcome Institutional Strategic Support Fund (ISSF).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* Core writing group
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos