Abstract
Background The development and approval of novel drugs are typically time-intensive and expensive. Leveraging a computational drug repurposing framework that integrates disease-relevant genetically regulated gene expression (GReX) and large longitudinal electronic medical record (EMR) databases can expedite the repositioning of existing medications. However, validating computational predictions of the drug repurposing framework remains a challenge.
Methods To benchmark the drug repurposing framework, we first performed a 5-method-rank-based computational drug prioritization pipeline by integrating multi-tissue GReX associated with COVID-19-related hospitalization, with drug transcriptional signature libraries from the Library of Integrated Network-Based Cellular Signatures. We prioritized FDA-approved medications from the 10 top-ranked compounds, and assessed their association with COVID-19 incidence within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) cohort (~9 million individuals). In parallel, we evaluated in vitro SARS-CoV-2 replication inhibition in human lung epithelial cells for the selected candidates.
Results Our in silico pipeline identified seven FDA-approved drugs among the top ten candidates. Six (imiquimod, nelfinavir and saquinavir, everolimus, azathioprine, and retinol) had sufficient prescribing rates or feasibility for further testing. In the VHA cohort, azathioprine (odds ratio [OR]=0.69, 95% CI 0.62–0.77) and retinol (OR=0.81, 95% CI 0.72–0.92) were significantly associated with reduced COVID-19 incidence. Conversely, nelfinavir and saquinavir demonstrated potent SARS-CoV-2 inhibition in vitro (~95% and ~65% viral load reduction, respectively). No single compound showed robust protection in both in vivo and in vitro settings.
Conclusions These findings underscore the power of GReX-based drug repurposing in rapidly identifying existing therapies with potential clinical relevance; four out of six compounds showed a protective effect in one of the two validation approaches. Crucially, our results highlight how a complementary evaluation—combining epidemiological data and in vitro assays—helps refine the most promising candidates for subsequent mechanistic studies and clinical trials. This integrated validation approach may prove vital for accelerating therapeutic development against current and future health challenges.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD under award numbers K08MH122911 (G.V.), R01AG078657 (G.V.), R01MH125246 (P.R.), U01MH116442 (P.R.), R01AG067025 (P.R.) and U24AG087563 (P.R.). This study was supported by the Veterans Affairs Merit grants: BX004189 (P.R.). This work was supported in part through the computational and data resources and staff expertise provided by Scientific Computing and Data at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and supported by the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) grant UL1TR004419 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Analysis of national VA data was conducted under the protocol, "Leveraging Electronic Health Information to Advance Precision Medicine (LEAP)", which was approved by VA Central Institutional Review Board and by the Research & Development Committees at Palo Alto, Salt Lake City, and West Haven VA Medical Centers.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵‡ These authors jointly supervised this work.
Abbreviations
- COVID-19
- Coronavirus Disease 2019
- SARS-CoV-2
- Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2
- GReX
- Genetically Regulated Gene Expression
- EMR
- Electronic Medical Record
- FDA
- Food and Drug Administration
- VHA
- Veterans Health Administration
- TWAS
- Transcriptome-Wide Association Study
- LINCS
- Library of Integrated Network-Based Cellular Signatures OR Odds Ratio
- CI
- Confidence Interval
- RT-PCR
- Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
- ACE2
- Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2
- BSL-3
- Biosafety Level 3
- MOI
- Multiplicity of Infection
- HIV
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus
- FDR
- False Discovery Rate
Paper in collection COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 preprints from medRxiv and bioRxiv
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.