Abstract
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the vital importance of multi-sectoral coordination in managing complex public health crises. Effective collaboration among stakeholders—including governments, health systems, private enterprises, civil society, and academia—has been pivotal in mitigating the pandemic’s impacts. However, significant gaps persist in understanding the mechanisms, benefits, and challenges of multi-sectoral coordination, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as Kenya. This systematic review seeks to address these knowledge gaps, providing actionable insights to strengthen future pandemic preparedness.
Methods and Analysis This systematic review will synthesize evidence on multi-sectoral coordination during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on key elements, benefits, challenges, and strategies for improvement. Studies meeting predefined inclusion criteria—such as those addressing coordination mechanisms and published in English between 2020 and 2024—will be sourced from electronic databases (PubMed, EBSCO Host, Emerald Insight, and Google Scholar) and reputable gray literature. A narrative synthesis will be conducted for qualitative data, and, where feasible, meta-analysis will aggregate quantitative findings. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses will compare coordination outcomes between LMICs and high-income countries (HICs). Risk of bias will be assessed using CASP and ROBINS-I tools, and confidence in evidence will be evaluated using GRADE and CERQual frameworks.
Ethics and Dissemination As this review does not involve primary data collection, additional ethics approval is not required. However, the study has received ethical clearance from the University of KwaZulu-Natal and Kenya’s National Commission for Science, Technology & Innovation (NACOSTI). The protocol will be disseminated through open-access publications in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at international and regional conferences, and institutional platforms to engage policymakers, researchers, and public health practitioners.
Strengths
Adherence to PRISMA-P guidelines ensures methodological rigor and transparency in the review process.
Comprehensive search strategy incorporates both peer-reviewed and gray literature, capturing diverse perspectives on multi-sectoral coordination during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Use of standardized tools, such as CASP and ROBINS-I, enhances the reliability of risk of bias assessments across qualitative and non-randomized quantitative studies.
Focus on LMICs, particularly Nairobi County, addresses a critical research gap and provides context-specific insights for global health research.
Emphasis on actionable recommendations aims to engage policymakers, practitioners, and researchers in improving multi-sectoral coordination frameworks.
Limitations
Exclusion of non-English studies may omit relevant data from non-English-speaking regions, limiting the comprehensiveness of findings.
Reliance on publicly available sources and databases may exclude unpublished or inaccessible studies, particularly from LMICs.
Heterogeneity of study designs and methodologies may complicate data synthesis and limit the feasibility of quantitative meta-analysis.
The study timeframe, constrained to research published between 2020 and 2024, may exclude emerging findings from newer studies.
Variability in the quality of gray literature introduces potential bias, requiring careful evaluation and transparent reporting.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Registration This protocol is registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023466849).
Contributions This protocol was conceptualized and developed by Javan Solomon Okello the lead PhD researcher, under the supervision of Dr. Julius Nyerere (Co-supervisor) and Prof. Themba Ginindza (Main Supervisor). Javan was responsible for designing the review methodology, drafting the protocol, and overseeing its implementation. Dr. Julius provided critical input on the research design and methodological approach, while Prof. Themba guided the overall structure and provided strategic oversight for the review. Both supervisors contributed to revising and finalizing the protocol, ensuring its alignment with best practices and academic rigor. Javan serves as the guarantor of the review, accountable for its accuracy and integrity.
Support This review is supported institutionally by the University of KwaZulu-Natal. No formal funding has been received for this project. The university provided access to resources and facilities necessary for developing the protocol.
Paper in collection COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 preprints from medRxiv and bioRxiv
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.