Abstract
Background Social accountability aligns the health demands and priorities of the community and the commitment of medical schools. Existing literature has proposed contextually distinctive interventions encompassing geographical initiatives, acting networks or parties, and systematic categorizations for the implementation of social accountability in a rural setting. Research concerning social accountability implementation strategies has been insufficient. This study provides an overview of the existing literature surrounding the social accountability practice of physicians and medical schools, in rural settings, through evidence of the barriers and facilitators inherent to the rural communities.
Methods This scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O’Malley Framework. Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and CINAHL were searched for peer-reviewed studies published since 2000.
Results A total of 2698 abstracts were identified, 180 full-text articles were reviewed, and 53 articles met the eligibility criteria across 15 different countries. Strategies used and problems inherent in promoting social accountability across physician practice and medical education are reported.
Conclusions This scoping review synthesizes existing evidence on the barriers and facilitators of social accountability practices in rural settings globally. The identified literature captures recurring themes of medical infrastructure inadequacy, community immersion curriculum design, targeted admission, geographical isolation, and institutional or peer support.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos