Abstract
This study evaluates the effectiveness of the Patient Report Template (PRT) in addressing inefficiencies in nursing workflows related to electronic health records (EHRs) and clinical decision support systems. The PRT aims to streamline patient handoffs, reduce charting time, enhance direct care hours, and improve patient safety. A survey was sent to 2,118 nurses at the University of Iowa Health Care System in order to gather feedback, with 106 participants electing to assess the perceived usefulness of the PRT components and their attitudes toward integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical documentation. Participants rated sections of the PRT, including Patient Profile, Review of Systems, and Safety, on a five-point Likert scale, with most components receiving high ratings for usefulness. Comfort and trust in AI were notably low, though respondents acknowledged the potential utility of AI-generated reports. The findings highlight the PRT’s potential to reduce cognitive load, improve information consistency during handoffs, and address EHR-related challenges. Future work will involve implementing the PRT in real-world clinical settings to validate its utility & accuracy and to explore its adaptability across specialized nursing units.
What is known
Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems carry burdens associated with data retrieval and entry, as well as introduce more friction to clinical workflow.
Electronic health record data is vast; free text clinical notes are abundant and underused.
While crucial for care continuity, handoffs often lack standardization and thus are prone to information loss and safety risks.
What this paper adds
Creation and feedback on a clinical decision support template which aims to reduce pain points associated with charting.
Feedback from 106 University of Iowa Health Care nurses about what they would and would not find useful in a patient handoff report.
Pathway to further usability and accuracy testing for reports which make use of items from the patient report template.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Institutional Review Board of The University of Iowa waived ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos