Abstract
Introduction The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) is characterised by loads of fake news and misinformation, which can influence vaccine acceptance. According to the World Health Organisation, implementing a harmonized public health strategy during an outbreak necessitates effective community engagement and communication, which facilitates public trust and decision-making. This study explored the role of community engagement in the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine in the midst of fake news and misinformation in two municipalities in Ghana.
Method A qualitative case study was employed using in-depth interviews with government officials from the Ghana Health Service, Municipal Assembly, Information Services Department and the National Commission on Civic Education and community gatekeepers. Additionally, focus group discussions were conducted with a cross-section of community members to understand the role of community engagement in vaccine acceptance. Qualitative analysis software Nvivo 12 was used to support thematic coding and analysis. All ethical procedures and COVID-19 preventive protocols were observed.
Results Study participants reported the sources of fake news and misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccines from interpersonal communication, the radio, and a popular anti-vaccine song. Some of the factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy were community members believed in the fake news and misinformation, low trust in the government and public institutions, and the lack of extensive education on COVID-19 vaccines. The Ghana Health Service was the most successful in engaging communities to promote vaccine acceptance in the midst of fake news and misinformation. It leveraged on its existing community-based health planning and services (CHPS) programme, which engaged the communities frequently through routine programmes such as durbars, antenatal clinics, child welfare clinics, and other community programmes to carry out engagement.
Conclusion For Ghana to promote uptake of health interventions, it is important that communities are effectively engaged. This can be done through the provision of resources to responsible government institutions for community engagement. The gains made by government institutions during the pandemic can be sustained through continued community engagement, which will empower them to contribute towards population health.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Yes
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The University of Health and Allied Sciences Research Ethics Committee approved this research
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Paper in collection COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 preprints from medRxiv and bioRxiv
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.