Abstract
Background India rolled out COVID-19 vaccinations for adults in January 2021 and children aged 12-18 in early 2022. A 2021 survey indicated that 63% of Indian parents were willing to vaccinate their children against COVID-19, with few studies examining vaccine hesitancy and acceptability. The the Behavioral and Social Drivers of Vaccination (BeSD) framework helps demonstrate which factors may affect vaccination uptake. Our study examined parents’ intentions-to-vaccinate their children below 18 years of age against COVID-19 in Mysore, India and their decision-making process using the BeSD framework.
Methods From November 2021 to May 2022, 506 parents/guardians of children below 18 years of age living in Mysore district, India were consented and interviewed by phone or face-to-face. We assessed their own COVID-19 vaccination status, vaccine confidence (Vaccine Confidence Index), intention-to-vaccinate their child against COVID-19, and other factors affecting vaccination such as demographic variables. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression was conducted to examine the association of influencing factors based on the literature and BeSD framework using Stata version 16.1. Intention-to-vaccinate was presented as odds ratios (OR) with associated 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).
Results The majority (91.3%) of the 503 participants fully trusted COVID-19 vaccines for their children. The same number (91.3%) had been fully vaccinated themselves, and 78.3% reported being (very) likely to vaccinate their children against COVID-19. Vaccine-hesitant and vaccine-confident groups were not significantly different socio-demographically. As parental age increased, parents had higher odds to express intention-to-vaccinate their child (OR: 1.04, 95%CI: 1.01-1.08). Parents from urban Mysore had lower odds to vaccinate their child compared to those from rural areas (OR: 0.53, 95%CI: 0.35-0.82).
Conclusion Most parents expressed vaccine confidence and intention-to-vaccinate their child against COVID-19. Exploring decision-making processes among parents is a crucial strategy to ensure effective implementation of vaccination programs.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Yes
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The protocol for this study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethics Review Board (IERB) of Public Health Research Institute of India (IERB Protocol no. 2021-10-30-63). Only participants completing the informed consent were included in the study.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Paper in collection COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 preprints from medRxiv and bioRxiv
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.