Abstract
Regional neuron loss following stroke can result in remote brain changes due to diaschisis and secondary brain atrophy. Whole brain changes post-stroke can be captured by the predicted brain age difference (brain-PAD), a neuroimaging-derived biomarker of global brain health previously associated with poorer chronic stroke outcomes. We hypothesized that greater lesion damage would be longitudinally associated with worsening brain-PAD during subacute stroke, and conversely, that poorer baseline brain-PAD would be associated with enlarged lesion damage.
We prospectively collected MRIs from 47 stroke patients across three sites within 3 weeks (baseline) and at 3 months (follow-up) post-stroke. Predicted brain age was estimated via a pretrained ridge regression model using 77 morphological features. Brain-PAD was calculated as predicted age minus chronological age. Robust linear mixed effects regression models were used to examine relationships between infarct volume and brain-PAD, adjusting for age, sex, time, and intracranial volume at baseline.
Larger baseline infarct volume was associated with accelerated brain aging at 3 months (β=0.87, p=0.023). Conversely, larger baseline brain-PAD predicted larger increase in infarct volume at 3 months (β=0.02, p=0.009). These findings reveal a bidirectional relationship between focal stroke damage and global brain health during the subacute period, underscoring the importance of assessing both.
Competing Interest Statement
S.-L.L. is a consultant for Synchron and co-owner of Ardist Inc. S.C.C. is a consultant for Constant Therapeutics, BrainQ, Myomo, MicroTransponder, Panaxium, Beren Therapeutics, Medtronic, NeuroTrauma Sciences, BlueRock Therapeutics, Simcere, and TRCare. J.H.C. is a shareholder and scientific advisor to Brain Key and Claritas HealthTech. All other authors report no competing interests.
Funding Statement
Research reported in this publication was supported by the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health under award number S10OD032285, as well as R01NS115845. Additional support was provided by NIH NINDS R56NS126748 and NIH R01NS110696.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Consent from all patients was obtained according to the Declaration of Helsinki and ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the University of Southern California, as well as the ethical committees for each collection site (Casa Colina Hospital, Emory University, and NYU Langone Health).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos