Abstract
The neurophysiological underpinnings of chronic pain and sleep disturbances, which are commonly comorbid are not well understood. Investigation of common structural and functional brain network alterations of sleep disturbance in the setting of chronic pain may shed light on common mechanisms and improve specificity of treatment for these conditions. Our study examines the association between sleep parameters (including sleep duration, sleep difficulty, and sleep chronotype), pain phenotype, and brain structural and functional connectivity in individuals with chronic pelvic pain by leveraging data from the Twin Studies of the Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Chronic Pelvic Pain (MAPP) Research Network. Participants (n= 34 pairs) completed extensive clinical phenotyping and 3T MRI, including resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and subjective sleep assessments. We observed significant differences in total sleep time (420 ± 58 min vs. 466 ± 61 min) and sleep difficulty (study-specific Likert scale 0-3: 1.35 ± 0.81 vs. 0.95 ± 0.68) among individuals with chronic pelvic pain compared to those without chronic pelvic pain, with sleep difficulty being associated with altered default mode network (DMN) connectivity. No associations were found with the salience network (SN), a network implicated in chronic pain. Additionally, increased total sleep time was associated with decreased posterior callosal white matter integrity. These findings underscore the complex interplay between chronic pain and sleep disturbances and have implications for distinct treatment approaches for patients with comorbid pain and sleep disorders.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study was funded by NIH U01 DK082325
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of Washington Medical Center approved this study protocol.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos