Abstract
Introduction In the post-pandemic era, people with underlying medical conditions continue to be at increased risk for severe COVID-19 disease, yet COVID-19 vaccination uptake remains low. This study estimated the clinical and economic impact of updated 2023/24 Moderna COVID-19 vaccination among high-risk adults versus no updated vaccination and versus updated Pfizer/BioNTech vaccination.
Methods A static Markov model was adapted for high-risk adults, including immunocompromised (IC), chronic lung disease (CLD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), cardiovascular disease (CVD), and diabetes mellitus (DM) populations in the United States.
Results Vaccination with the updated Moderna vaccine at current coverage rates was estimated to prevent considerable COVID-19 hospitalizations in CLD (101,309), DM (97,358), CVD (47,830), IC (14,834) and CKD (13,558) populations versus no updated vaccination. Vaccination also provided net medical cost savings of $399M–2,129M (healthcare payer) and $457M–2,531M (societal perspective), depending on population. The return-on-investment was positive across all conditions ($1.10–$2.60 gain for every $1 invested). Healthcare savings increased with a relative 10% increase in current vaccination coverage ($439M–$2,342M), and from meeting US 2030 targets of 70% coverage ($1,096M–$5,707M). Based on higher vaccine effectiveness observed in real-world evidence studies, updated Moderna vaccination was estimated to prevent additional COVID-19 hospitalizations in DM (13,105), CLD (10,359), CVD (6,241), IC (1,979), and CKD (942) versus Pfizer/BioNTech’s updated vaccine, with healthcare payer and societal cost savings, making it the dominant strategy. Healthcare savings per patient vaccinated with Moderna versus Pfizer/BioNTech’s updated vaccine were $31-59, depending on population. Results were robust across sensitivity/scenario analyses.
Conclusions Updated 2023/24 Moderna COVID-19 vaccination was estimated to provide significant health benefits through prevention of COVID-19 in high-risk populations, and cost-savings to healthcare payers and society, versus no vaccination and updated Pfizer/BioNTech vaccination. Increasing current low COVID-19 vaccination coverage rates was estimated to be cost-saving while preventing many more severe infections and hospitalizations in these high-risk populations.
Why carry out this study?
In the US, people with underlying medical conditions continue to be at high risk of severe COVID-19, yet vaccination rates are low.
The CDC recommends an updated 2024/25 COVID-19 vaccination for everyone aged >6 months.
The objective of this study was to estimate the clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness of updated 2023/24 Moderna COVID-19 vaccination in people with high-risk conditions, versus no updated vaccination, and versus updated Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination.
What was learned from the study?
COVID-19 vaccination with the updated Moderna mRNA vaccine of people with underlying medical conditions at high-risk of severe COVID-19 was cost-saving versus no updated vaccination. It also provided more health gains with cost savings versus Pfizer/BioNTech, making it the dominant strategy.
For every $1 spent on vaccination, the updated Moderna vaccination provided a return-on-investment of $1.10–$2.60 versus no updated vaccination, depending on the high-risk population. Healthcare cost savings were $31-59 per patient vaccinated with Moderna’s versus Pfizer/BioNTech’s updated vaccination, depending on the high-risk population.
A relative 10% increase in vaccination coverage rates prevented 10% more hospitalizations and deaths, and increased healthcare and societal cost savings in all high-risk populations, with the potential for significant health and financial benefits with greater vaccine coverage rates.
Competing Interest Statement
This study was sponsored by Moderna, Inc. KJ, HK, JM, NVV, and EB are employees of Moderna, Inc and may hold stocks/options in Moderna, Inc. VNH received funding from Moderna, Inc. MD and EP are employees of Putnam which received funding from Moderna, Inc.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by Moderna, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data presented in this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.
