Abstract
Background Understanding protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection by vaccine and hybrid immunity is important for informing public health strategies as new variants emerge.
Methods We analyzed data from three cohort studies spanning September 1, 2022–July 31, 2023, to estimate COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against SARS-CoV-2 infection and symptomatic COVID-19 among adults with and without prior infection in the United States. Participants collected weekly nasal swabs, irrespective of symptoms, annual blood draws, and completed periodic surveys, which included vaccination status and prior infection history. Swabs were tested molecularly for SARS-CoV-2. VE was estimated using Cox proportional hazards models for the hazard ratios of infections, adjusting for covariates. VE was calculated considering prior infection and recency of vaccination.
Results Among 3,343 adults, adjusted VE of bivalent vaccine against infection was 37.2% (95% CI: 11.4-58.5%) within 7-60 days of vaccination and 17.0% (95% CI: -3.7-33.2%) within 60-179 days of vaccination compared to participants who were unvaccinated/received an original monovalent vaccine dose ≥180 days prior. Overall, adjusted VE of bivalent vaccine, in conjunction with prior infection, was 62.2% (95% CI: 44.2-74.6%) within 7-179 days of vaccination and 39.4% (95% CI: 11.7-61.3%) ≥180 days compared to naïve participants who were unvaccinated/received a monovalent vaccine dose ≥180 days prior.
Conclusions Adults with both prior infection and recent vaccination had high protection against infection and symptomatic illness. Recent vaccination alone provided moderate protection.
Competing Interest Statement
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Chu reported receiving personal fees from AbbVie, Vindico, Ellume, Medscape, Merck, Clinical Care Options, Cataylst Medical Education, Vir, Pfizer, and Prime Education. Dr Englund reported receiving personal fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Merck, Meissa Vaccines, Moderna, Sanofi Pasteur, Pfizer, Ark Biopharma, GSK (formerly GlaxoSmithKline), and Shinogi. Dr Lauring reported receiving personal fees from Roche and Sanofi and receiving grants from the Flu Lab and the Burroughs Wellcome Fund. Dr Martin reported receiving grants from Merck. Dr Monto reported receiving personal fees from Roche. Dr Grijalva reported grants from the National Institutes of Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Food and Drug Administration, and Campbell Alliance/Syneos Health; consulting fees; and participation on a data safety and monitoring board for Merck.
Clinical Protocols
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/7/e071446.long
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under contract numbers: 75D30121C12297 to Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, 75D30122C13149 to the University of Michigan, and 75D30122C13379 to Vanderbilt University. This project has also been funded in part with Federal funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health, and Human Services, under Contract No. 75N93021C00015. The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR) is funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) Clinical Translational Science Award (CTSA) Program, Award Number 5UL1TR002243-03. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was reviewed by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and approved by the institutional review boards at participating sites (Vanderbilt University Medical Center, University of Michigan School of Public Health, and Kaiser Permanente Northwest) and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Section on vaccine effectiveness (VE) against infection has been revised to match Table 3; there were 1.74 infections per 1,000 person-days (not 1.75) among participants who were either unvaccinated or received a monovalent dose at least 180 days prior. Additionally, adjusted VE of a bivalent dose received within 7-60 days against laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection was 37.2% (not 37.3%).
Data Availability
All data produced in the present analysis are restricted until the completion of the study.
