ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate longitudinal changes in spatiotemporal gait parameters after maximal versus moderate speed locomotor training in chronic stroke, by comparing short-burst high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity aerobic training (MAT). Compared to MAT, short-burst HIIT was hypothesized to exhibit greater improvement in non-paretic step length.
Design Secondary analysis from the HIT-Stroke randomized controlled trial
Setting Three rehabilitation research centers
Participants Individuals with chronic stroke and residual walking limitations (N=55)
Interventions Participants were randomized to short-burst HIIT (N=27) or MAT (N=28) for 45 minutes of walking practice, 3 times weekly, over 12 weeks. HIIT involved 30-second bursts of maximum walking speed, targeting >60% heart rate reserve (HRR). MAT involved continuous walking, targeting 40%-60% HRR.
Main Outcome Measure(s) Mean spatiotemporal gait parameter changes between groups, averaging the 4-week, 8-week, and 12-week estimates minus baseline. The primary measure of interest was non-paretic step length, an indicator of paretic propulsion and biomechanical efficiency.
Results Non-paretic step length increased significantly more in the HIIT group (+4.4 cm [95% CI, 1.9, 6.9]) compared to the MAT group (+0.1 [-2.5, 2.7]; HIIT vs. MAT p = .01). Both groups demonstrated significant increases in cadence, paretic step length, and bilateral single support time, and significant decreases in the coefficient of variation (CV) for stride velocity, stride time, and stride length. Symmetry measures did not significantly change in either group.
Conclusions Greater increases in non-paretic step length with short-burst HIIT suggest that maximal speed training may yield greater increases in paretic propulsion, a marker of biomechanical efficiency. Both moderate and maximal speed training (MAT and HIIT) appear to reduce spatiotemporal variability, possibly indicating improved gait stability.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT03760016
Funding Statement
This research was supported by grant R01HD093694 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Institutional Review Board of University of Cincinnati gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at https://dash.nichd.nih.gov/study/424597
Abbreviation List
- HIIT
- high-intensity interval training
- MAT
- moderate-intensity aerobic training
- HRR
- heart rate reserve
- CV
- coefficient of variation
- M-HIT
- moderate to high-intensity gait training
