Summary
Background Many subsistence-level and Indigenous societies around the world are rapidly experiencing urbanization, nutrition transition, and integration into market-economies, resulting in marked increases in cardiometabolic diseases. Determining the most potent and generalized drivers of changing health is essential for identifying vulnerable communities and creating effective policies to combat increased chronic disease risk across socio-environmental contexts. However, comparative tests of how different lifestyle features affect the health of populations undergoing lifestyle transitions remain rare, and require comparable, integrated anthropological and health data collected in diverse contexts.
Methods We developed nine scales to quantify different facets of lifestyle (e.g., urban infrastructure, market-integration, acculturation) in two Indigenous, transitioning subsistence populations currently undergoing rapid change in very different ecological and sociopolitical contexts: Turkana pastoralists of northwest Kenya (n = 3,692) and Orang Asli mixed subsistence groups of Peninsular Malaysia (n = 688). We tested the extent to which these lifestyle scales predicted 16 measures of cardiometabolic health and compared the generalizability of each scale across the two populations. We used factor analysis to decompose comprehensive lifestyle data into salient axes without supervision, sensitivity analyses to understand which components of the multidimensional scales were most important, and sex-stratified analyses to understand how facets of lifestyle variation differentially impacted cardiometabolic health among males and females.
Findings Cardiometabolic health was best predicted by measures that quantified urban infrastructure and market-derived material wealth compared to metrics encompassing diet, mobility, or acculturation, and these results were highly consistent across both populations and sexes. Factor analysis results were also highly consistent between the Turkana and Orang Asli and revealed that lifestyle variation decomposes into two distinct axes–the built environment and diet–which change at different paces and have different relationships with health.
Interpretation Our analysis of comparable data from Indigenous peoples in East Africa and Southeast Asia revealed a surprising amount of generalizability: in both contexts, measures of local infrastructure and built environment are consistently more predictive of cardiometabolic health than other facets of lifestyle that are seemingly more proximate to health, such as diet. We hypothesize that this is because the built environment impacts unmeasured proximate drivers like physical activity, increased stress, and broader access to market goods, and serves as a proxy for the duration of time that communities have been market-integrated.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Research support was provided by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (T32HL144446), the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM147267), and the National Science Foundation (DGE-1937963; Biological Anthropology 2142090). Further research support was received from the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (Azrieli Global Scholars Program), the Kinship Foundation (Searle Scholars Program), the Pew Charitable Trusts (Pew Biomedical Scholars Program), and a Cobb Professional Development Grant from the American Association of Biological Anthropologists. Princeton University provided research support to support data collection by the Turkana Health and Genomics Project. The Malaysian Red Crescent Society provided support for data collection for the Orang Asli Health and Lifeways Project.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
he Turkana Health and Genomics Project was approved by the Princeton University Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects Research (Institutional Review Board no. 10237) and Maseno University (approval number MUERC-00519-18). The Orang Asli Health and Lifeways Project was approved by the Medical Review and Ethics Committee of the Malaysian Ministry of Health (protocol ID: NMRR-20-2214-55565), the Malaysian Department of Orang Asli Development (permit ID: JAKOA.PP.30.052 JLD 21 (98)) and the Institutional Review Board of Vanderbilt University (protocol ID: 212175).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
https://github.com/mwatowich/Multi-population_lifestyle_scales
