Structured Summary
Background With increasing recognition of the value of incorporating prognostic markers into amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) trial design and analysis plans, there is a pressing need to understand which among the prevailing clinical and biochemical markers have real value, and how they can be optimally used.
Methods A subset of patients with ALS recruited through the multi-center Phenotype-Genotype-Biomarker study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02327845) was identified as “trial-like” based on meeting common trial eligibility criteria. Clinical phenotyping was performed by evaluators trained in relevant assessments. Serum neurofilament light (NfL) and phosphorylated neurofilament heavy (pNfH), urinary p75ECD, plasma microRNA-181, and an array of biochemical and clinical measures were evaluated for their prognostic value. Associations with functional progression were estimated by random-slopes mixed models of ALS functional rating scale-revised (ALSFRS-R) score. Associations with survival were estimated by log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression. Potential sample size savings from adjusting for given biomarkers in a hypothetical trial were estimated.
Findings Baseline serum NfL is a powerful prognostic biomarker, predicting survival and ALSFRS-R rate of decline. Serum NfL <40pg/ml and >100pg/ml correspond to future ALSFRS-R slopes of ∼0.5 and 1.5 points/month, respectively. Serum NfL also adds value to the best available clinical predictors, encapsulated by the European Network to Cure ALS (ENCALS) predictor score. In models of functional decline, the addition of NfL yields ∼25% sample size saving above those achieved by inclusion of either clinical predictors or ENCALS score alone. The prognostic value of serum pNfH, urinary p75ECD, and plasma miR-181ab is more limited.
Interpretation Among the multitude of biomarkers considered, only blood NfL adds value to the ENCALS prediction model and should be incorporated into analysis plans for all ongoing and future ALS trials. Defined thresholds of NfL might also be used in trial design, for enrichment or stratified randomisation, to improve trial efficiency.
Funding NIH (U01-NS107027, U54-NS092091). ALSA (16-TACL-242).
Evidence Before This Study The phenotypic heterogeneity of ALS poses a challenge for clinical trials, making it more difficult to discern therapeutic effects of investigational agents amidst the noise of natural variability. Prognostic markers are important tools to help mitigate this issue. A host of clinical markers and putative biomarkers have been proposed to have prognostic value, but their relative utility, especially when considered jointly, and the practical implications of their use, have not been well defined.
Added Value of This Study Using a trial-like population from a natural history study, in which clinical trial-grade phenotypic data and multi-modal biomarker data were collected, we show that a subset of clinical factors, encapsulated by the ENCALS predictive model score, and serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) are the most powerful prognostic markers when considering either ALSFRS-R functional decline or permanent assisted ventilation (PAV)/tracheostomy-free survival. Importantly, serum NfL adds prognostic value even after adjusting for the ENCALS score, yielding an additional sample size saving of ∼27% in a hypothetical future clinical trial. While serum phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chain (pNfH), urinary p75ECD, and plasma miR-181ab each holds some prognostic value, when considered together with the ENCALS score and serum NfL, only p75ECD may yield additional but modest sample size saving.
Implication of All Available Evidence Blood NfL is a validated biomarker for multiple contexts-of-use. As a prognostic marker, it should be used together with clinical predictors, such as the ENCALS predictive model score, in all ongoing and future ALS clinical trials. The utility of urinary p75ECD and plasma miR-181ab is less clear. Serum pNfH, as well as serum uric acid, albumin, creatinine, and C-reactive protein (CRP), provide no additional prognostic information.
Competing Interest Statement
MB reports grants from the NIH (U01NS107027, U54NS092091) and the ALS Association (16-TACL-242) in support of this work. He is also an unpaid member of the Board of Trustees for the ALS Association. He has served as a consultant to Alector, Alexion, Annexon, Arrowhead, Biogen, Cartesian, Denali, Eli Lilly, Horizon, Immunovant, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB, and UniQure. EAM reports grants from the NIH (U01NS107027, U54NS092091). He also serves as a consultant to Annexon, Biogen, Bial Biotech, Cortexyme, Chase Therapeutics, Enterin, nQ Medical, Partner Therapeutics, Stoparkinson Healthcare, and UCB. He has served on DSMBs for NeuroSense Therapeutics, Novartis, and Sanofi. AM reports grants from the NIH (U01NS107027). He has also provided consulting services to Roche, Pfizer, and Accure Therapeutics. MLR reports support from grants from the NIH (U01NS107027, U54NS092091) and FightMND. EH has nothing to declare. VL has nothing to declare. DR has nothing to declare. SS has nothing to declare. IM has nothing to declare. YC has nothing to declare. VG currently is an employee of Biohaven Pharmaceutical Inc. JS receives research funding from the NIH< MDA, FSHD Society, Friends of FSH Research, and FSHD Canada. He also serves as a consultant or on scientific advisory boards for Avidity, Fulcrum, Dyne, Armatus, Epic Bio, Roche, Lupin, and Entrada JH has nothing to declare. RR reports grants from the NIH (U54NS092091) in support of this work. She is also an unpaid member of the Medical Advisory Board of the Association for Frontotemporal Dementias (AFTD) and a paid member of the Scientific Advisory Board of the Kissick Family Foundation FTD Grant Program CAM reports funding from the ALS Association and the NIH (U54NS092091). LP reports support from the Mayo Clinic Foundation and grants from the National Institute on Aging (5P30AG0062677, U19AG063911) the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U54NS123743, R35NS097273, P01NS084974) and Target ALS Foundation. CM reports grants from the NIH (AG066597, AG076411, AG066152, AG072979, NS109260, NS092091), Department of Defense, and support from the Penn Institute on Aging, Decrane Family PPA Fund, and Newhouse Fund.2 JW reports funding from the NIH (U01NS107027, U54NS092091) and the ALS Association (16-TACL-242) in support of this work.
Funding Statement
The CReATe Consortium (U54NS092091) is part of the NIH Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN), an initiative of the Office of Rare Diseases Research (ORDR), NCATS. This Consortium is funded through a collaboration between NCATS and the NINDS. This work was also supported by a Clinical Trial Readiness grant (U01NS107027) from NINDS and by a grant from the ALS Association to support the CReATe Biorepository (grant ID 16-TACL-242).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The University of Miami institutional review board (IRB), which served as the central IRB for CReATe, approved the study for all US sites study (protocol # 20160603) and the University of Cape Town Health Sciences Human Research Ethics Committee approved the study in South Africa (REF number 165/2017). All participants provided written informed consent.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Following publication, de-identified participant data and a data dictionary defining each field in the dataset, will be made available following request to the corresponding authors and upon execution of a data access agreement.
