Abstract
Background Women with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have a 50% excess risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) than men with T2D. We compared circulating metabolites and their associations with CHD in men and women across glycemic status.
Methods We used metabolomic data (lipoproteins, fatty acids, amino acids, glycolysis, ketones, inflammation, and fluid balance) for 87,326 CHD-free UK Biobank participants. We used linear regressions to examine the association of sex and metabolites (log) in newly diagnosed T2D (diagnosis<2 yrs from baseline), prediabetes (A1c 5.7-6.5%), and euglycemia, accounting for age, race, Deprivation Index, income, smoking, alcohol drinking, obesity, physical activity, medications for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes. We used Cox models to evaluate the association of metabolites and CHD risk by sex, adjusting the same covariates and menopausal status (women). All analyses were FDR-adjusted.
Findings We included 1250 individuals with new T2D, 12,706 with prediabetes, and 83,315 with euglycemia. In adjusted linear regressions, women showed a progressive increase in atherogenic lipid and lipoprotein markers and inflammatory marker, glycoprotein acetyls, compared to men as their glycemic status advanced. However, women had lower levels of albumin during this transition. Menopausal status did not alter these sex differences. In a 10-year follow-up, an SD higher total TG, TG in VLDL, LDL, and HDL, saturated fatty acids (SFA) were positively associated with a higher risk of CHD in women with T2D but not in men (p-interactions 0.03-0.15).
Interpretation With advancing glycemic status, women exhibited higher levels of atherogenic lipids and lipoproteins, as well as inflammatory markers, but lower circulating albumin. Women with T2D appear to be at a higher risk of CHD associated with TG, VLDL-TG, LDL-TG, and HDL-TG, and SFA than men with T2D.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The American Diabetes Association (7-23-JDFWH-10) and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (1P20GM152305).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study used ONLY openly available human data that were originally located at the UK biobank study with approved data requests.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding The American Diabetes Association (7-23-JDFWH-10) and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (1P20GM152305).
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos