Abstract
Anti-nucleocapsid (N) antibody assays can be used to estimate SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence in regions employing anti-spike based COVID-19 vaccines. However, poor sensitivity of anti-N assays in detecting infections after vaccination (VI) has been reported. To support serological monitoring of infections, including VI, in a large blood donor cohort (N=142,599), we derived a lower cutoff for identifying previous infection using the Ortho VITROS Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Total-N Antibody assay, improving sensitivity while maintaining specificity >98%. Sensitivity was validated in samples donated after self-reported infections diagnosed by a swab-based test. Sensitivity for first infections in unvaccinated donors was 98.1% (95% CI: 98.0,98.2) and for VI was 95.6% (95.6,95.7), using the standard cutoff. Regression analysis showed sensitivity was reduced in the Delta compared to Omicron period, in older donors, asymptomatic infections, ≤30 days after infection and for VI. The standard Ortho anti-N threshold demonstrated good sensitivity, which was modestly improved with the revised cutoff.
Competing Interest Statement
Vitalant Research Institute receives research funding from QuidelOrtho. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by research contracts from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC Contract 75D30120C08170). The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All blood donors consented to use of deidentified, residual specimens for further research purposes. Consistent with the policies and guidance of the University of California San Francisco Institutional Review Board, Vitalant Research Institute self-certified the use of deidentified donations in this study as not meeting the criteria for human subjects research. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) investigators reviewed and relied on this determination as consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy (45 C.F.R. part 46, 21 C.F.R. part 56; 42 U.S.C. 241[d]; 5 U.S.C. 552a; 44 U.S.C. 3501). The donor surveys conducted by Vitalant and American Red Cross were conducted under protocols supervised and approved by the Advarra and American Red Cross Institutional Review Boards, respectively, and linked to biospecimens in deidentified form.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data used in the study may be shared, subject to IRB requirements and consent of all partnering organizations, upon reasonable request to the authors.
