ABSTRACT
Severe trauma can induce systemic inflammation but also immunosuppression, which makes understanding the immune response of trauma patients critical for therapeutic development and treatment approaches. By evaluating the levels of 59 proteins in the plasma of 50 healthy volunteers and 1000 trauma patients across five trauma centers in the United States, we identified 6 novel changes in immune proteins after traumatic injury and further new variations by sex, age, trauma type, comorbidities, and developed a new equation for prediction of patient survival. Blood was collected at the time of arrival at Level 1 trauma centers and patients were stratified based on trauma level, tissues injured, and injury types. Trauma patients had significantly upregulated proteins associated with immune activation (IL-23, MIP-5), immunosuppression (IL-10) and pleiotropic cytokines (IL-29, IL-6). A high ratio of IL-29 to IL-10 was identified as a new predictor of survival in less severe patients with ROC area of 0.933. Combining machine learning with statistical modeling we developed an equation (“VIPER”) that could predict survival with ROC 0.966 in less severe patients and 0.8873 for all patients from a five analyte panel (IL-6, VEGF-A, IL-21, IL-29, and IL-10). Furthermore, we also identified three increased proteins (MIF, TRAIL, IL-29) and three decreased proteins (IL-7, TPO, IL-8) that were the most important in distinguishing a trauma blood profile. Biologic sex altered phenotype with IL-8 and MIF being lower in healthy women, but higher in female trauma patients when compared to male counterparts. This work identifies new responses to injury that may influence systemic immune dysfunction, serving as targets for therapeutics and immediate clinical benefit in identifying at-risk patients.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by the intramural research programs of the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice, the principles of the Belmont Report, and HHS regulations enumerated under 45 CFR 46. Five of the sites had the Chesapeake/Advarra Institutional Review Board as the central IRB (Advarra Protocol # Pro00022129), and the Jacksonville, FL site had the University of Florida Institutional Review Board as the IRB of record. De-identified healthy volunteer blood samples were collected under clinical protocol NCT0000128 and NIH IRB-approved protocol 99-CC-0168 at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda MD.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
New Figure 4 with added analyses for survival prediction.
Data Availability
Data and abbreviated clinical information will be made available in supplement after peer review. Not all detailed clinical information gathered during the study will be made available to prevent de-identification of samples and participants. Some values may be changed to ensure privacy of data while maintaining ability to complete any necessary meta-analyses.
