ABSTRACT
Objectives This study investigates gender and sex disparities in COVID-19 epidemiology in the Canton of Vaud, Switzerland, focusing on the interplay with socioeconomic position (SEP) and age.
Methods We analyzed COVID-19 surveillance data from March 2020 to June 2021, using an intersectional approach. Negative binomial regression models assessed disparities between women and men, across SEP quintiles and age groups, in testing, positivity, hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and mortality (Incidence Rate Ratios [IRR], with 95% Confidence Intervals [CI]).
Results Women had higher testing and positivity rates than men, while men experienced more hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and deaths. The higher positivity in women under 50 was mitigated when accounting for their higher testing rates. Within SEP quintiles, gender/sex differences in testing and positivity were not significant. In the lowest quintile, women’s mortality risk was 68% lower (Q1: IRR 0.32, CI 0.20-0.52), with decreasing disparities with increasing SEP quintiles (Q5: IRR 0.66, CI 0.41-1.06).
Conclusion Our findings underscore the complex epidemiological patterns of COVID-19, shaped by the interactions of gender/sex, SEP, and age, highlighting the need for intersectional perspectives in both epidemiological research and public health strategy development.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research received financial support from the ProFemmes scholarship program, granted by the Faculty of Biology and Medicine of the University of Lausanne.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was conducted in compliance with ethical standards and received formal approval from the Ethics Committee of the Canton of Vaud (CER-VD), under project-ID number 2021-01870.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
1.Title revision: The title was revised to be more concise and appealing, ensuring it better captures the essence of the study while adhering to the journal's requirements. 2.Clarification of the distinct gender and sex impacts: Following suggestions to better differentiate the impacts of gender and sex on COVID-19 outcomes, we enhanced our introduction to clearly distinguish the roles that gender and sex play in the epidemiology of the disease. 3.Specification of data collection methods: We refined our methods section to specify how data on gender/sex was collected, addressing concerns about the clarity of our gender/sex categorization. 4.Clarification of the SAGER guidelines implications: To address feedback on the application of the Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines, we included a new subsection in our methods detailing these guidelines. We explain how our study adheres to these standards by thoroughly discussing the potential implications of sex and gender on our results, and highlighting the distinct underlying mechanisms by which both gender and sex may be at play in our findings. 5.Enhanced discussion on intersectionality: We expanded our discussion to more strongly emphasize the concept of intersectionality, as recommended. This included a detailed exploration of how intersecting factors like gender, age, and SEP influence COVID-19 outcomes, enhancing our manuscript's alignment with contemporary public health research. 6.Limitations and data constraints: We clarified the limitations related to the availability and differentiation of the sex/gender indicator. This includes acknowledging the methodological challenges posed by using binary administrative categories in the analysis and their implications for disentangling the underlying mechanisms of both gender and sex influencing COVID-19 outcomes. 7.Comprehensive manuscript enhancement: Throughout this revision process, we have taken the opportunity to improve the entire manuscript, putting our findings more into perspective with the literature. Figure 2 was slightly revised for clarity, and the supplementary materials were adapted to enhance understanding of the data and analyses presented.
Data Availability
All data presented in this study are available upon reasonable request to the authors, subject to any applicable privacy or ethical restrictions.
