ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has claimed nearly one million lives and has drastically changed how patients interact with the healthcare system. Emergency medical services (EMS) are essential for emergency response, disaster preparedness, and responding to everyday emergencies. We therefore examined differences in EMS utilization and call severity in 2020 (pandemic period) compared to trends from 2015-2019 (pre-pandemic period) in a large, multi-state advanced life support EMS agency serving the U.S. Upper Midwest. Specifically, we analyzed all 911 calls made to Mayo Clinic Ambulance, the sole advanced life support EMS provider serving a large area in Minnesota and Wisconsin, in 2020 compared to those made between 2015-2019. We compared the number of emergency calls made in 2020 to the number of calls expected based on trends from 2015-2019. We similarly compared caller demographics, call severity, and proportions of calls made for overdose/intoxication, behavioral health, and motor vehicle accidents. Subgroup analyses were performed for rural vs. urban areas. We identified 262,232 emergent EMS calls in the pre-pandemic period and 53,909 calls in the pandemic period, corresponding to a decrease of 28.7% in call volume during the pandemic period. Caller demographics shifted towards older patients (mean age 59.7 [SD, 23.0] vs. 59.1 [SD, 23.7] years; p<0.001) and to rural areas (20.4% vs. 20.0%; p=0.007). Call severity increased, with 95.3% of calls requiring transport (vs. 93.8%; p<0.001) and 1.9% resulting in death (vs. 1.6%; p<0.001). The proportion of calls for overdose/intoxication increased from 4.8% to 5.5% (p<0.001), while the proportion of calls for motor vehicle collisions decreased from 3.9% to 3.0% (p<0.001). All changes were more pronounced in urban areas. These findings underscore the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacted healthcare utilization, particularly in urban areas, and suggest that patients may have delayed calling EMS with potential implications on disease severity and risk of death.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Yes
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This cross-sectional study was conducted using the Patient Care Record (PCR) of Mayo Clinic Ambulance. It was deemed exempt from review by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board as it involved analysis of de-identified patient data. The study was conducted and is reported in accordance with STROBE guidelines for observational cohort studies.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
