Abstract
Institutions of higher education faced a number of challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Chief among them was whether or not to re-open during the second wave of COVID-19 in the fall of 2020, which was controversial because incidence in young adults was on the rise. The migration of students back to campuses worried many that transmission within student populations would spread into surrounding communities. In light of this, many colleges and universities implemented mitigation strategies, with varied degrees of success. Washington State University (WSU), located in the city of Pullman in Whitman County, WA, is an example of this type of university-community co-location, where the role of students returning to the area for the fall 2020 semester was contentious. Using COVID-19 incidence reported to Whitman County, we retrospectively study the transmission dynamics that occurred between the student and community subpopulations in fall 2020. We develop a two-population ordinary differential equation mechanistic model to infer transmission rates within and across the university student and community subpopulations. We use results from Bayesian parameter estimation to determine if sustained transmission of COVID-19 occurred in Whitman County and the magnitude of cross-transmission from students to community members. We find these results are consistent with estimation of the time-varying reproductive number and conclude that the students returning to WSU-Pullman did not place the surrounding community at disproportionate risk of COVID-19 during fall 2020 when mitigation efforts were in place.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
ETL, MSM and EC were funded by contracts 75D30121P10551, 75D30120P07911 and 75D30122C15691 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as well as RAPID 2110109 from the National Science Foundation. ETL was also supported on R35GM147013 from the National Institutes of Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was determined to be exempt by the Washington State University Institutional Review Board.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
The manuscript was slightly reframed to focus on whether a student subpopulation had an impact on the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the surrounding community, rather than focusing on the importance of using a two-population model structure is important among respiratory disease outbreaks in small communities or populations. The same model and analysis were performed as in the original manuscript, with the addition of estimating the basic reproductive number (R) to determine sustained transmissibility within each subpopulation and the total population.
