Abstract
Background Young Carers faced significant challenges brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. We explored the impact of the pandemic and associated restrictions on mental health, wellbeing and access to support in Young Carers in the United Kingdom (UK) to understand how to improve services, as well as support this population in future health emergencies.
Method We conducted 22 qualitative semi-structured interviews from May to November 2021, with 14 Young Carers and 8 staff working in organisations that supported them. Interviews took place remotely over video or telephone call, discussing topics such as experiences of the pandemic on their health, wellbeing and caring responsibilities. We used reflexive thematic analysis to analyse interview transcripts.
Results We identified 4 overarching themes pertaining to the impact of the pandemic and associated restrictions on mental health, wellbeing, and access to support in Young Carers in the UK: 1) challenges to following the guidelines, 2) changes to and loss of routine, 3) changes in provision of informal and formal support and 4) better understanding of inner resilience and goals. Many participants struggled with their mental health and wellbeing as a result of pandemic related restrictions, impacting on support structures for themselves, as well as the individual cared for. However, positive impacts pertained to additional support from local authority and third sector organisations.
Conclusions Our findings highlight some of the changes that affected Young Carers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The impact of changes to routine and a reduction in pre-pandemic support were the greatest concerns reported by participants in this study. The additional support provided by local authority and third sector organisations during social restrictions suggests such organisations could play a greater role in supporting this population going forward, and that schools and Governments may wish to put in additional strategies and provisions to protect this population in the future.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The Covid-19 Social Study was funded by the Nuffield Foundation [WEL/ FR-000022583], but the views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily the Foundation. The study was also supported by the MARCH Mental Health Network funded by the Cross-Disciplinary Mental Health Network Plus initiative supported by UK Research and Innovation [ES/S002588/1], and by the Wellcome Trust [221400/Z/20/Z]. DF was funded by the Wellcome Trust [205407/Z/16/Z].
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All procedures involving human participants were approved by the University College London Ethics Committee (project IDs: 14895/005 and 6357/002).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available, nor are they available upon request, because the dataset consist of interview transcripts that might compromise participant privacy and confidentiality due to the sensitive nature of topics discussed.
