Abstract
Background A diagnosis of an inherited cardiac condition may cause guilt for having the condition (i.e. personal guilt), for passing it to one’s offspring (i.e. reproductive guilt), and may also impact the reproductive decision-making. We sought to identify factors that are associated with guilt and reproduction decision-making amongst patients with inherited cardiomyopathy and arrhythmia syndromes.
Methods We used an anonymous web-based survey that included validated measures to assess patients’ perceptions of their illness and quality of life and questions on feeling personal guilt and reproductive guilt, genetic testing results, family planning, and cascade screening.
Results Of 514 potential participants, 128(24.9%) responded to the survey. Most respondents had cardiomyopathy(66.4%). Thirty-eight(29.6%) respondents were probands and 41 (32.0%) had ICDs. Probands had a more severe perception of illness score compared to non-probands(p<0.01). Thirty-four percent(13/38) of probands and 8.8% (8/90) of non-probands reported reproductive guilt(p<0.001). Reproductive guilt was associated with a more severe perception of illness(p<0.001) and a proband status (p=<0.001). After adjusting for illness perception, being a proband was no longer a predictor for reproductive guilt. Twenty-two participants (17.2%) reported experiencing current or past personal guilt, with a trend of more personal guilt amongst patients with inherited arrhythmia (33.3%vs.15%,p=0.06). Personal guilt was associated with a worse illness perception (p<0.001), a lower quality of life (p=0.01) and proband status (p<0.001), with thirty-four percent (13/38) of probands vs. ten percent of non-probands (9/90) (p<0.001) feeling or having felt personal guilt. After adjusting for quality of life and illness perception proband status did not remain an independent predictor for personal guilt.
Conclusion Personal and reproductive guilt are common among individuals with inherited cardiac conditions despite having good quality of life. Probands are more prone to feeling guilt due to a worse illness perception. Better opportunities for psychologic and genetic counseling for these patients are warranted.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
None
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the Hartford Healthcare Institutional Review Board.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.