Abstract
We sought to determine pre-infection correlates of protection against SARS-CoV-2 post-vaccine infections (PVI) acquired during the first Omicron wave in the United States. Serum and saliva samples from 176 vaccinated adults were collected from October to December of 2021, immediately before the Omicron wave, and assessed for SARS-CoV-2 Spike-specific IgG and IgA binding antibodies (bAb). Sera were also assessed for bAb using commercial assays, and for neutralization activity against several SARS-CoV-2 variants. PVI duration and severity, as well as risk and precautionary behaviors, were assessed by questionnaires. Serum anti-Spike IgG levels assessed by research assay, neutralization titers against Omicron subvariants, and low home risk scores correlated with protection against PVIs after multivariable regression analysis. Commercial assays did not perform as well as research assay, likely due to their lower dynamic range. In the 32 participants that developed PVI, anti-Spike IgG bAbs correlated with lower disease severity and shorter duration of illness.
Competing Interest Statement
S.D.P., T.H.B, and D.R.T. report that the USU IDCRP, a U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) Institution, and the HJF were funded under a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement to conduct an unrelated phase III COVID-19 monoclonal antibody immunoprophylaxis trial sponsored by AstraZeneca. The HJF, in support of the USU IDCRP, was funded by the DoD Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Defense to augment the conduct of an unrelated phase III vaccine trial sponsored by AstraZeneca. Both trials were part of the USG COVID-19 response. Neither is related to the work presented here.
Funding Statement
The protocol was executed by the Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program (IDCRP), a Department of Defense (DoD) program executed by the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS) through a cooperative agreement by the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. (HJF). This work was supported in whole, or in part, with federal funds from the Defense Health Program (HU00012020067, HU00012120094) and the Immunization Healthcare Branch (HU00012120104) of the Defense Health Agency, United States Department of Defense, from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (HU00011920111) under Inter-Agency Agreement Y1-AI-5072, from the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division (AFHSD), Global Emerging Infections Surveillance (GEIS) Branch, under award ProMIS ID P0099_22_NM and Navy WUN A1417, and from the US Food and Drug Administration Medical Countermeasures Initiative grant # OCET 2022-1750. The sponsors had no involvement in the study design, the collection of data, the analysis of data, the interpretation of data, the writing of the report, or in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study protocol was approved by the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences' Institutional Review Board in compliance with all applicable federal regulations governing the protection of human subjects.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
In addition to revisions made to Supplemental Figures 1 and 4, Figure 3a, we are also adding one minor additional statistical analysis. We conducted a pseudoR2 analysis to determine how strongly a model that includes age, sex, home risk score, and bAb level correlates with protection against infection. The analysis demonstrated that our final model fits 37.5% better than a model that predicts the same risk of acquiring infection for all individuals. We have added the analysis and results to the methods and results sections. We also have the following statement now added to the last paragraph of the discussion: Finally, it is important to note that while we identified independent immunological (bAb levels) and behavioral (household exposure risk) predictors of infection, no single factor served as a highly accurate correlate of protection. Indeed, the pseudoR2 analysis we conducted suggests that a model that includes age, sex, home risk score, and bAb level is only 37.5% better at predicting who would have developed symptomatic infection than a model with no predictors. Then we conclude that future studies should try to account for a large number of host variables including when trying to build better predictive models of protection.
