Abstract
Objective This study assesses whether chronotype is related to COVID-19 infection and whether there is an interaction with shift work.
Methods Cross-sectional survey of 19,821 U.S. adults
Results COVID-19 infection occurred in 40% of participants, 32.6% morning and 17.2% evening chronotypes. After adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic factors, shift work, sleep duration and comorbidities, morning chronotype was associated with a higher (aOR: 1.15, 95% CI 1.10-1.21) and evening chronotype with a lower (aOR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.78-0.87) prevalence of COVID-19 infection in comparison to an intermediate chronotype. Working exclusively night shifts was not associated with higher prevalence of COVID-19. Morning chronotype and working some evening shifts was associated with the highest prevalence of previous COVID-19 infection (aOR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.28-2.74).
Conclusion Morning chronotype and working a mixture of shifts increase risk of COVID-19 infection.
Learning Outcomes
Describe the association between chronotype and prevalence of COVID-19 infection
Summarize the combined effect of chronotype and shift work on the prevalence of COVID-19 infection
Competing Interest Statement
MDW reported consulting fees from Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, the National Sleep Foundation, and the University of Pittsburgh. MEC reported personal fees from Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc., research grants or gifts to Monash University from WHOOP, Inc., Hopelab, Inc., CDC Foundation, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CAC reported receiving grants and personal fees from Teva Pharma Australia, receiving grants from the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health R01-OH-011773, personal fees from and equity interest in Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc, educational and research support from Philips Respironics Inc, an endowed professorship provided to Harvard Medical School from Cephalon, Inc, an institutional gift from Alexandra Drane, and a patent on Actiwatch-2 and Actiwatch-Spectrum devices with royalties paid from Philips Respironics Inc. CAC s interests were reviewed and managed by Brigham and Womens Hospital and Partners HealthCare in accordance with their conflict of interest policies. CAC also served as a voluntary board member for the Institute for Experimental Psychiatry Research Foundation, Inc. SMWR reported receiving grants and personal fees from Cooperative Research Centre for Alertness, Safety, and Productivity, receiving grants and institutional consultancy fees from Teva Pharma Australia and institutional consultancy fees from Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Circadian Therapeutics, BHP Billiton, and Herbert Smith Freehills. SFQ has served as a consultant for Best Doctors, Bryte Foundation, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Whispersom. RR reports personal fees from SleepCycle AB; Rituals Cosmetics BV; Denihan Hospitality Group, LLC; AdventHealth; and With Deep, LLC. PV reports no conflicts of interest associated with this work. LKB reports institutional support from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institutes of Occupational Safety and Health, Delta Airlines, and the Puget Sound Pilots; as well as honorariums from the National Institutes of Occupational Safety and Health, University of Arizona, and University of British Columbia. No other disclosures were reported.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Dr. M. Czeisler was supported by an Australian-American Fulbright Fellowship, with funding from The Kinghorn Foundation. The salary of Drs. Barger, Czeisler, Robbins and Weaver were supported, in part, by NIOSH R01 OH011773 and NHLBI R56 HL151637. Dr. Robbins also was supported in part by NHLBI K01 HL150339.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (Study #24036) approved the study.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors