ABSTRACT
Objectives To develop a simulation model to support orthopaedic elective capacity planning.
Methods An open-source, generalisable discrete-event simulation was developed, including a web-based application. The model used anonymised patient records between 2016-2019 of elective orthopaedic procedures from an NHS Trust in England. In this paper, it is used to investigate scenarios including resourcing (beds and theatres) and productivity (lengths-of-stay, delayed discharges, theatre activity) to support planning for meeting new NHS targets aimed at reducing elective orthopaedic surgical backlogs in a proposed ring fenced orthopaedic surgical facility. The simulation is interactive and intended for use by health service planners and clinicians.
Results A higher number of beds (65-70) than the proposed number (40 beds) will be required if lengths-of-stay and delayed discharge rates remain unchanged. Reducing lengths-of-stay in line with national benchmarks reduces bed utilisation to an estimated 60%, allowing for additional theatre activity such as weekend working. Further, reducing the proportion of patients with a delayed discharge by 75% reduces bed utilisation to below 40%, even with weekend working. A range of other scenarios can also be investigated directly by NHS planners using the interactive web app.
Conclusions The simulation model is intended to support capacity planning of orthopaedic elective services by identifying a balance of capacity across theatres and beds and predicting the impact of productivity measures on capacity requirements. It is applicable beyond the study site and can be adapted for other specialties.
Strengths and Limitations of this study
The simulation model provides rapid quantitative estimates to support post-COVID elective services recovery toward medium-term elective targets.
Parameter combinations include changes to both resourcing and productivity.
The interactive web app enables intuitive parameter changes by users while underlying source code can be adapted or re-used for similar applications.
Patient attributes such as complexity are not included in the model but are reflected in variables such as length-of-stay and delayed discharge rates.
Theatre schedules are simplified, incorporating the five key orthopaedic elective surgical procedures.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Health Data Research (HDR) UK South West Better Care Partnership (#6.12). AH, TM and MP are supported by the National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula. RW, EE, TJ and MTR's time was supported by the National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West). AJ, MW, AB and CP were supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
We were provided with pseudonymised North Bristol Trust hospital admissions data under the NIHR ARC West Partnership Agreement. The project received ethical approval from the University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences ethical review board on 3 November 2020 (ref# 109024).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
a.l.harper{at}exeter.ac.uk t.m.w.monks{at}exeter.ac.uk m.pitt{at}exeter.ac.uk
Rebecca.wilson{at}bristol.ac.uk Theresa.redaniel{at}bristol.ac.uk Emily.eyles{at}bristol.ac.uk timothy.jones{at}bristol.ac.uk
Andrew.judge{at}bristol.ac.uk chris.penfold{at}bristol.ac.uk
tim.keen{at}nbt.nhs.uk Andrew.elliott{at}nbt.nhs.uk Michael.Whitehouse{at}bristol.ac.uk
a.blom{at}sheffield.ac.uk
Data Availability
Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. The data used in the study are collected by the North Bristol NHS Trust (NBT) as part of their care and support. Sharing of anonymised data with the University of Bristol was underpinned by a data sharing agreement and solely covers the purposes of this study. Data requests can be made through the NBT. Code, input parameters and output data used for results in this paper are available on GitHub: AliHarp/HEP: Model of orthopaedic ward (github.com) and are permanently archived using Zenodo (HEP | Zenodo). All are licensed using MIT permissive license MIT License | Choose a License.
