Abstract
Background Emergency departments (EDs) are the primary source of healthcare for many patients diagnosed with sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Expedited partner therapy (EPT), treating the partner of patients with STIs without an exam of the partner, is an evidence-based practice for patients who might not otherwise seek care. Little is known about EPT use in the ED. In a national survey, we describe ED medical directors’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices of EPT.
Methods A cross-sectional internet survey of medical directors from academic EDs using the Academy of Academic Administrators of Emergency Medicine (AAAEM) Benchmarking Group from July through September 2020. Primary outcomes were EPT awareness, support, and use. The survey also examined barriers and facilitators. Multivariable regressions explored predictors of EPT support.
Results Forty-eight of 70 (69%) medical directors responded, representing EDs with a median volume of 67,840 patients/year. Awareness of EPT was high (73%), but fewer knew how to prescribe it (38%), and only 19% of EDs had implemented EPT. Most (79%) supported EPT and were more likely to if they were aware of EPT (89% vs. 54%) p=0.01. Of non-implementers, 41% thought EPT was feasible, and 56% thought departmental support would be likely. Of potential barriers, ED directors were most concerned about legal liability (25% moderately to extremely). Benefits of EPT were rated with similar importance, with preventing sequelae of untreated STIs most frequently rated as “extremely important” (44%). Linear regression showed increased years in practice, and ED’s proportion of Medicaid patients was significantly positively associated with support for EPT.
Conclusion ED medical directors expressed strong support for EPT and reasonable levels of feasibility for implementation but low utilization. Our findings highlight the need to identify mechanisms for EPT implementation and develop ED-tailored implementation tools to bolster this practice.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Dr. Solnick was supported by the U-M National Clinician Scholars Program at the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation during this project. This work was also supported by the University of Michigan Resident and Fellow Research Development Grant award (RDG).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The University of Michigan institutional review board gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Prior Presentations: SAEM 2021 Virtual Conference
Financial Support: Dr. Solnick was supported by the U-M National Clinician Scholars Program at the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation during this project. This work was also supported by the University of Michigan Resident and Fellow Research Development Grant award (RDG).
Conflict of Interest Disclosure: Authors report no conflict of interest
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
