Disparities in Mortality Associated with Acute Myocardial Infarction and COVID-19 in the United States: A Nationwide Analysis

Amer Muhyieddeen; Susan Cheng; Mamas A Mamas; Dorian Beasley; Galen Cook Weins; Martha Gulati

doi:10.1101/2023.03.30.23287987

Abstract

Background The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on potential racial disparities in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) management and outcomes is unclear. We examined AMI patient management and outcomes during the pandemic’s initial nine months, comparing COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cases.

Methods We identified all patients hospitalized for AMI in 2020 using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS), identifying those with or without concurrent COVID-19. Logistic and linear regression was used for analyses of associations, with adjustment for potential confounders.

Results Patients with both AMI and COVID-19 had higher in-hospital mortality rates (aOR 3.19, 95% CI 2.63-3.88), mechanical ventilation (aOR 1.90, 95% CI 1.54-2.33), and hemodialysis (aOR 1.38, 95% CI 1.05-1.89) compared to those without COVID-19. Black and Asian/Pacific Islander patients had higher in-hospital mortality than White patients, (aOR 2.13, 95% CI 1.35-3.59) and (aOR 3.41, 95% CI 1.5-8.37). Moreover, Black, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander patients had higher odds of initiating hemodialysis, (aOR 5.48, 95% CI 2.13-14.1), (aOR 2.99, 95% CI 1.13-7.97), and (aOR 7.84, 95% CI 1.55-39.5) and were less likely to receive PCI for AMI, (aOR 0.71, 95% CI 0.67-0.74), (aOR 0.81, 95% CI 0.77-0.86), and (aOR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.90). Additionally, Black patients had a lower likelihood of undergoing CABG surgery for AMI (aOR 0.55, 95% CI 0.49-0.61).

Conclusion Our study revealed increased mortality and complications in COVID-19 patients with AMI, highlighting significant racial disparities. Urgent measures addressing healthcare disparities, such as enhancing access and promoting culturally sensitive care, are needed to improve health equity.

Competing Interest Statement

Disclosures: Martha Gulati. Served on an advisory board for Novartis and Esperion. She is a co-investigator and site PI of the Women's IschemiA TRial to Reduce Events In Non-ObstRuctive CAD (WARRIOR) Study funded by the Department of Defense (Award Number: W81XWH-17-2-0030).

Funding Statement

The authors declare that no external funding was received for this work. No third party provided payment or services for any aspect of the submitted work, including study design, data collection, analysis, manuscript preparation, or any other related activities. All research was conducted independently, without financial support from external sources.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Not Applicable

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This research utilized the National Inpatient Sample and was exempt from Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval due to the de-identified nature of the data, which ensures the protection of participants' privacy and confidentiality.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Not Applicable

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Not Applicable

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Not Applicable