Abstract
Background Two risk variants in the apolipoprotein L1 gene (APOL1) have been associated with increased susceptibility to sepsis in Black patients. However, it remains unclear whether APOL1 high-risk genotypes are associated with occurrence of either sepsis or sepsis-related phenotypes in patients hospitalized with infections, independent of their association with pre-existing severe renal disease.
Methods A retrospective cohort study of 2,242 Black patients hospitalized with infections. We assessed whether carriage of APOL1 high-risk genotypes was associated with the risk of sepsis and sepsis-related phenotypes in patients hospitalized with infections. The primary outcome was sepsis; secondary outcomes were short-term mortality and organ failure related to sepsis.
Results Of 2,242 Black patients hospitalized with infections, 565 developed sepsis. Patients with high-risk APOL1 genotypes had a significantly increased risk of sepsis (odds ratio [OR]=1.29 [95% CI, 1.00–1.67; p=0.047]); however, this association was not significant after adjustment for pre-existing severe renal disease (OR=1.14 [95% CI, 0.88-1.48; p=0.33]), nor after exclusion of those patients with pre-existing severe renal disease (OR=0.99 [95% CI, 0.70-1.39; p=0.95]. APOL1 high-risk genotypes were significantly associated with the renal dysfunction component of the Sepsis-3 criteria (OR=1.64 [95% CI, 1.21–2.22; p=0.001], but not with other sepsis-related organ dysfunction or short-term mortality. The association between high-risk APOL1 genotypes and sepsis-related renal dysfunction was markedly attenuated by adjusting for pre-existing severe renal disease (OR=1.36 [95% CI, 1.00–1.86; p=0.05]) and was nullified after exclusion of patients with pre-existing severe renal disease (OR=1.16 [95% CI, 0.74–1.81; p=0.52]).
Conclusion APOL1 high-risk genotypes were associated with an increased risk of sepsis; however, this increased risk was attributable predominantly to pre-existing severe renal disease.
Funding This study was supported by R01GM120523 (Q.F.), R01HL163854 (Q.F.), R35GM131770 (C.M.S.), HL133786 (W.Q.W.), and Vanderbilt Faculty Research Scholar Fund (Q.F.). The dataset(s) used for the analyses described were obtained from Vanderbilt University Medical Center’s BioVU which is supported by institutional funding, the 1S10RR025141-01 instrumentation award, and by the CTSA grant UL1TR0004from NCATS/NIH. Additional funding provided by the NIH through grants P50GM115305 and U19HL065962. The authors wish to acknowledge the expert technical support of the VANTAGE and VANGARD core facilities, supported in part by the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center (P30 CA068485) and Vanderbilt Vision Center (P30 EY08126).
The funders had no role in design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by R01GM120523 (Q.F.), R01HL163854 (Q.F.), R35GM131770 (C.M.S.), HL133786 (W.Q.W.), and Vanderbilt Faculty Research Scholar Fund (Q.F.). The dataset(s) used for the analyses described were obtained from Vanderbilt University Medical Center's BioVU which is supported by institutional funding, the 1S10RR025141-01 instrumentation award, and by the CTSA grant UL1TR0004from NCATS/NIH. Additional funding provided by the NIH through grants P50GM115305 and U19HL065962. The authors wish to acknowledge the expert technical support of the VANTAGE and VANGARD core facilities, supported in part by the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center (P30 CA068485) and Vanderbilt Vision Center (P30 EY08126). The funders had no role in design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was reviewed by the VUMC Institutional Review Board; given the study's retrospective design and use of deidentified data only, informed consent was waived.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
The authors declared no competing interests for this work.
1)We revised the title to clarify the study design and population. 2)We have revised the abstract structure. 3)We have removed the author contributions. 4)We have completed the MDAR checklist and additionally added the STROBE checklist as a supplementary file. 5)We removed Supplementary Figure 1, as it now has been published in another paper from the Feng lab (after the initial submission of this paper). We now reference the publication (Liu G, Jiang L, Kerchberger VE, et al.: The relationship between high density lipoprotein cholesterol and sepsis: A clinical and genetic approach. Clin Transl Sci 2023; 16:489-501). 6)We have renamed the supplementary tables and created a legend at the end of the main file. 7)We have added a data availability statement and now make code available (on github). Additionally, we now provide expanded summary data for Figures 1, 2, & 3. As we now note in our statement, BioVU participant consenting procedures limit access to individual level data. Therefore, limited primary cohort data are available by request, pending BioVU approval and a data use agreement. 8)We have generated an impact statement: A common genetic variant in Black patients increases the risk of renal disease, which increases the risk of sepsis, but there is no direct association between the variant and sepsis, suggesting medications targeting the variant are more appropriate for preventative care than acute treatment of sepsis.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
