Abstract
Content validity is often lacking in tools for the assessment of competency in medical specialty and subspecialty trainees. The primary aim of this study was to develop a protocol for early test assessment in pediatric hematology using iterative rounds of expert evaluation in the context of explicit knowledge goals. We used the pediatric hematology content of the American Board of Pediatrics as a test case for assessment protocol development. We found that the use of expert input and three rounds of test development increased test content validity. The instrument developed here has the potential to improve assessment of competency in pediatric hematology. This approach also may be useful in the development of competency assessment tools for other medical subspecialties.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by NIH grant T32 HL007344
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
