Abstract
Background Studies suggest vaccine hesitancy is an increasingly significant phenomenon in Brazil and other countries. Moreover, political ideologies have emerged as an influencing factor for vaccine hesitancy during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods In this study, we use information from publicly available databases to investigate the association between political alignment, depicted by the percentage of Bolsonaro voters in the presidential elections of 2018 and 2022, and COVID-19 vaccination in Brazilian municipalities, adjusted for human development index (HDI) scores and basic sociodemographic characteristics of voters.
Findings For both the 2018 and 2022 elections, higher percentages of Bolsonaro voters were significantly associated with a lower vaccination index after adjustment for voters’ sociodemographic characteristics. We also found a statistically significant interaction between the percentage of Bolsonaro voters and HDI, with a more significantly detrimental effect of the right-wing political stance in municipalities in the lower HDI quartile.
Interpretation Our study highlights what may be the beginning of a new scenario with unforeseen challenges for vaccine programs: the politicization of vaccines. Strategies to face these challenges should include joint efforts from governments and civil society for a common public health goal.
Funding This manuscript received no specific funding
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study used publicly available, de-identified data only. Data sources are provided in the reference list
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
This study used publicly available, de-identified data only. Data sources are provided in the reference list
https://sig.tse.jus.br/ords/dwapr/seai/r/sig-eleicao-resultados/home?session=15363086146230
https://infoms.saude.gov.br/extensions/DEMAS_C19_Vacina_v2/DEMAS_C19_Vacina_v2.html
