Abstract
Introduction The susceptibility to suicidal behaviour has been linked to cognitive functioning deficits. Gamified assessments have emerged as a practical and engaging approach to assess these deficits, though their acceptability amongst young adults with suicidal thoughts is currently understudied.
Methods Thirteen young Australian adults aged 18 to 25 years who experienced suicidal thoughts in the past year were recruited to evaluate the smartphone based CogGame app. Inductive thematic analysis was utilised to identify the themes obtained from the interviews. The relationships between cognitive functioning deficits and the severity of suicidal thoughts were explored by correlational analyses.
Results All participants found the GogGame app easy to learn to use and navigate. Positive experiences and high user satisfaction were reported with the use of CogGame app. Major areas for improvement include having clearer instructions and app information, adjusting the difficulty of the exercises, and addressing a few technical issues such as decreasing loading time. Higher levels of suicidal thoughts were found to be significantly associated with poorer visual learning performance on the CogGame app (p = .01).
Conclusion Positive participant experiences with CogGame revealed the promising potential of gamified assessments to measure cognitive functioning in young adults with suicidal thoughts.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study was supported by the Bupa Health Foundation Emerging Health Researcher Award to JH. JH is supported by the National Suicide Prevention Post-Doctoral Research Fellowship (RG193218). LM is supported by a joint National Health and Medical Research Council Australian Research Council Dementia Research Development Fellowship (1109618). The development and build of the CogGame was supported by funding from the University of Sydney-University of New South Wales seed funding scheme: Mental Health and Wellbeing Early Intervention awarded to HML, JH, VWSC, and LM.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The ethics committee of the University of New South Wales gave ethical approval for this work (HC210432).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
