Abstract
Introduction In this study we examine whether social health markers measured at baseline are associated with differences in cognitive capability and in the rate of cognitive decline over an 11-to-18-year period among older adults and compare results across studies.
Methods We applied an integrated data analysis approach to 16,858 participants (mean age 65 years; 56% female) from the National Survey for Health and Development (NSHD), the English Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSA), the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen (SNAC-K), and the Rotterdam Study. We used multilevel models to examine social health in relation to cognitive capability and the rate of cognitive decline.
Results Pooled estimates show distinct relationships between markers of social health and cognitive domains e.g., a large network size (≥6 people vs none) was associated with higher executive function (0.17 SD[95%CI:0.0, 0.34], I2=27%) but not with memory (0.08 SD[95%CI: -0.02, 0.18], I2=19%). We also observed pooled associations between being married or cohabiting, having a large network size and participating in social activities with slower decline in cognitive capability, however estimates were close to zero e.g., 0.01SD/year [95%CI: 0.01 to 0.02] I2=19% for marital status and executive function. There were clear study-specific differences: results for average processing speed were the most homogenous and results for average memory were the most heterogenous.
Conclusion Overall, markers of good social health have a positive association with cognitive capability. However, we found differential associations between specific markers of social health and cognitive domains and differences between studies. These findings highlight the importance of examining between study differences and considering context specificity of findings in developing and deploying any interventions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This project is part of the Social Health And Reserve in the Dementia patient journey (SHARED) SHARED Consortium, an EU Joint Programme-Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND). The project is supported by Alzheimer's Society (Ref:469) in the UK, by ZonMw/JPND (733051082) in the Netherlands, by NCBiR (National Center for Research and Development in Poland, project number (JPND/06/2020) in Poland, by the NHMRC (National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1169489) in Australia. FG received additional support from the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics. NSHD is funded and supported by the UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00019/2). The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing was developed by a team of researchers based at University College London, NatCen Social Research, the Institute for Fiscal Studies, the University of Manchester and the University of East Anglia. The data were collected by NatCen Social Research. The funding is currently provided by the National Institute on Aging (Ref: R01AG017644) and by a consortium of UK government departments: Department for Health and Social Care; Department for Transport; Department for Work and Pensions, which is coordinated by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR, Ref: 198-1074). Funding has also been provided by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). SNAC-K (http://www.snac.org) is financially supported by the Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs; participating County Councils and Municipalities; the Swedish Research Council; and Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare. This project was funded by the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life, and Welfare (FORTE grant no.: 2018-01888 to AK Welmer).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval for the NSHD was obtained from the Greater Manchester Local Research Ethics Committee and the Scotland A Research Ethics Committee. Written, informed consent was obtained from the study member for each component of data collection. ELSA has received ethical approval from the South Central Berkshire Research Ethics Committee (21/SC/0030, 22nd March 2021). SNAC-K was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Stockholm and written informed consent was obtained from participants or their next of kin. The Rotterdam Study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Erasmus MC (registration number MEC 02.1015) and by the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport (Population Screening Act WBO, license number 1071272-159521-PG). The Rotterdam Study has been entered into the Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR; www.trialregister.nl) and into the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP; www.who.int/ictrp/network/primary/en/) under shared catalogue number NTR6831. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
This version has been revised to correct table 1 and to re-format and elaborate on the results.
Data Availability
NSHD data used in this study are available to bona fide researchers upon request to the NSHD Data Sharing Committee via a standard application procedure. Further details can be found at http://www.nshd.mrc.ac.uk/data doi: 10.5522/NSHD/Q101, 10.5522/NSHD/Q102 and doi: 10.5522/NSHD/Q103. ELSA data used in this study are available to download through the UK data service. doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-5050-16. SNAC-K data used in this study are available to researchers upon approval by the SNAC-K data management and maintenance committee. Applications for accessing these data can be submitted to Maria Wahlberg (Maria.Wahlberg{at}ki.se) at the Aging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Requests for access to the data from Rotterdam Study reported in this paper can be addressed to the data management team of the Rotterdam Study (secretariat.epi{at}erasmusmc.nl).
