Abstract
Background Preconception care may improve perinatal outcomes and reduce disparities, but there is no standard population measure of preconception care utilization (PCU).
Objective We compared claims-based PCU from Medicaid Analytic Extract (MAX) data to self-report in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment and Monitoring System (PRAMS) survey.
Methods Among Medicaid-enrolled women ages 15-45 with births during 2012, we identified preconception services in MAX using 55 ICD9 codes published by Health and Human Services. We estimated the proportion reporting preconception care from 26 PRAMS states and compared this to the states’ proportion who received services in MAX. We fit mixed-effects logistic regression models of the probability of PCU on demographic factors (age, race/ethnicity) and diagnoses (depression, diabetes, or hypertension), separately for each dataset. Finally, we computed the population proportions receiving care by state (MAX) and the empirical Bayes means of the state-level effects (MAX and PRAMS).
Results Among 652,929 deliveries in MAX from the included states, 28.1% received at least one preconception service. In PRAMS, 23.6% (95% CI [22.1, 25.3]) of Medicaid-covered respondents reported preconception care. In both datasets, PCU rates were higher for Black non-Hispanic vs. White non-Hispanic women (PRAMS OR 2.05 [1.60, 1.62]; MAX OR 1.51 [1.49, 1.54]) and for those with diabetes (PRAMS OR 1.82 [1.16, 2.85]; MAX OR 1.34 [1.29, 1.40]) or hypertension (OR 1.85 [1.41, 2.44]; MAX OR 1.22 [1.18, 1.27]). In PRAMS, Asian (OR 3.37 [2.28, 4.98]) and Hispanic women (OR 2.07 [1.5, 2.80]) were more likely to report PCU than White non-Hispanic women, but in MAX they were less likely to receive services. The correlation between the PRAMS state-specific effects and those from MAX was 0.31 (p = 0.124).
Conclusions Claims-based estimates of PCU are moderately concordant with self-reported rates at the state level; however, rates measured through Medicaid claims vs. self-report diverge in some groups.
Study Question How do Medicaid claims-based measures of preconception care utilization compare to self-reported receipt of preconception counseling among Medicaid-covered respondents in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment and Monitoring System (PRAMS) survey?
What’s already known PRAMS provides population-level estimates of preconception care utilization, while claims-based measures quantify specific services received.
What this study adds Claims-based preconception care utilization among the Medicaid population varies by race (Black/White) and diagnosis of diabetes or hypertension in similar patterns as self-report in PRAMS, but ethnicity (Hispanic/non-Hispanic) and depression demonstrate divergent patterns between the two data sources. State-level variation in preconception care utilization is greater in claims data. Both data sources can be used by researchers with an understanding of their methodological benefits and limitations.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (grant number R03 HS27027). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB of the University of Chicago gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
This is a secondary analysis of data received from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services under an approved Data Use Agreement which governs all requests for data sharing.
