Abstract
Biomedical factors and social determinants of health (SDH) affect preterm birth (PTB). Given the complexity of PTB and the increasing rates in the United States, public datasets involving multicomponent variables—from biomedical to structural—can motivate novel interventions to address PTB in the US. The primary aim of this study was to develop a PTB registry based on multi-modal data collection tools that prioritize biomedical and SDH data and identify PTB phenotype (i.e. spontaneous labor, preterm premature rupture of membrane, or medically indicated). The secondary aim of this study was to execute a pilot study to assess feasibility. This study aimed to describe recruitment practices, assess data accessibility and concordance, and to provide an example of how the registry can be used to generate hypothesis and analyze data. We designed the registry through a conceptual model provided by the Dahlgren and Whitehead model of SDH using validated questionnaires and literature on PTB. The registry included a survey, interview, and medical and birth certificate abstraction. To pilot the registry, we recruited 92 participants who delivered preterm, were admitted for risk of preterm delivery, or delivered at term at an urban public hospital. Enrollment was most effective in-person and in the postpartum period. Consent to different parts of the registry was similar regardless of when participants were recruited. There was also a range of data concordance depending on the data source and chosen variable. The registry’s PTB phenotype algorithm identified the correct PTB phenotype 100% of the time. The example analysis demonstrated six unique SDH domains. Participants who delivered preterm reported an average of 11 total stressors and 19.7 protective items and 66% had a significant medical or obstetric comorbidity. Results of this study demonstrate that a PTB registry is feasible and could help advance research to prevent PTB.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Preterm Birth Initiative. RJ and JS received the funding. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. https://pretermbirthca.ucsf.edu/california-preterm-birth-initiative
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The University of California, San Francisco Institutional Review Board approved the study (#17-21932). Written consent was obtained from all participants.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Disclosures: The authors report no real or perceived vested interests that relate to this article that could be construed as a conflict of interest.
Funding: This study was funded by the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Preterm Birth Initiative. RJ and JS received the funding.
Ethical considerations: The University of California, San Francisco Institutional Review Board approved the study (#17-21932). Written consent was obtained from all participants.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
