Abstract
Introduction Low back pain (LBP) is a major cause of disability and is progressively becoming worse on a global scale. [1,2] The prevention and rehabilitation of LBP lacks clarity in part due to the heterogeneity of the exercise programs prescribed to treat low back pain. Some authors have proposed stabilizing exercises for lower back pain which exert minimal loads on the spine. [3,4,5] Despite a multitude of existing exercise therapies, McGill has introduced three exercises for rehabilitating lower back pain, termed the McGill Big Three (MGB3). [6,7,8,9,10] These include the curl-up, side plank and bird-dog. The purpose of this review is to investigate the clinical outcomes from prescribing the MGB3 to individuals with chronic LBP.
Methods Inclusion criteria were randomized control trials that involved an intervention with MGB3 core stabilization exercises for patients with chronic low back pain. The research included articles published during any period in full English text. Studies were critically reviewed by two authors EL and GG independently and collaboratively.
Results In total, four randomized control trials were included in this review. Multiple cohorts, with varying age, demographics and occupation were studied. Outcomes studied included various pain scores, patient reported functional and performance measures.
Discussion Controlled clinical trials employing this method in low back pain treatment showed low quality data with mixed statistical significance, and little to no clinical significance irrespective of the measure used or even when compared to baseline. Limitations of these trials are detailed herein.
Conclusion Currently there is limited data supporting the clinical benefit of the McGill approach for the treatment of low back pain based on the available randomized clinical trials. More study is required prior to widespread adoption into clinical practice.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
