ABSTRACT
The Cohort Size Shrinkage Index (CSSI) is the most widely used intensity measure in studies of the Chinese famine of 1959-1961. We examined requirements to construct a valid CSSI measure: reliable information on birth cohort size; a stable cohort size trend outside the famine years; and limited migrations. We used census data to examine the cohort size trend and concentrated on the time window of 1950-1970 to exclude events with a large impact on cohort size trends other than the famine. We observed a significant difference in cohort size trends comparing pre-famine and post-famine births. Compared to pre-famine based CSSI (p-CSSI), pre- & post-famine based CSSI (pp-CSSI) tends to overestimate famine intensity at higher mean CSSI levels and underestimate intensity at lower mean levels. In Sichuan province, we demonstrated a less pronounced dose-response relation between famine intensity and tuberculosis outcomes using p-CSSI as compared to pp-CSSI. These observations demonstrates that the CSSI is not a robust measure as had been assumed previously. We recommend the use of p-CSSI and encourage researchers to re-examine their results of Chinese famine studies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The census data are openly available, and can be obtained from https://international.ipums.org/international/. The data of tuberculosis study can be found at https://github.com/qu-cheng/TB_famine.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Manuscript updated; Supplemental files updated
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.
