Abstract
Objectives We examined associations between accelerators (interventions impacting two or more SDG targets) and well-being indicators among adolescents in Zambia.
Methods We randomly sampled 1,800 households receiving social cash transfers (SCT) in four districts, surveyed adults 16 years and older. Using multivariable logistic regressions, stratified by household heads disability status, we examined associations between accelerators (SCT, life-long learning (LLL), mobile phone access (MPA)) and seven well-being indicators among adolescents 16 to 24 years old. We predicted adolescents’ probabilities of reporting indicators using marginal effects models.
Results We included 1,725 adolescents, 881(51.1%) girls. MPA was associated with no poverty (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] 2.08, p<0.001), informal cash transfers (aOR 1.82 p=0.004), seeking mental support (aOR 1.61, p=0.020); SCT with no health access restrictions related to disability (aOR 2.56, p=0.004), lesser odds seeking mental support (aOR 0.53, p=0.029); LLL with informal cash transfers (aOR 3.49, p<0.001), lower school enrolment (aOR 0.70, p=0.004). Adolescents living with disabled household heads reported worse poverty, good health, less suicidal ideation.
Conclusions Accelerators - SCT, LLL, MPA - were associated with well-being indicators. Adolescents living with disabled household heads benefited less.
Relevance to SDGs This paper shows that adopting accelerators can help achieve SDGs-aligned well-being indicators for adolescents living in poverty. However, accelerators may not offset disability-related inequalities. Adolescents living with disabled household heads may require more attention to achieve the SDGs.
SDGs targets 1.2. no poverty; 1.3.1 social cash transfers, Informal cash transfers; 3. good Health; 3.4. no suicidal ideation; 3.4. seeking mental support; 4.1. school enrolment; 10. no health access restrictions related to disability.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Financial support was received from the United Kingdom Research in Innovation (UKRI) Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) Accelerating Achievement for Africa Adolescents Hub (Principal Investigator Prof. Lucie Cluver). Olivier Keiser was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no 163878). Support was also received of the Ministry of Community Development and Social Welfare, Ministry of Health, National AIDS Council, the Global Fund to Fight AIDS TB and Malaria Zambia Country Co-ordinating Mechanism secretariat, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) and the International Labour Organisation, are appreciated for their support. However, information in this article are the views of authors and not of UNAIDS, ILO, nor other institutions listed.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study protocol was reviewed by the University of Zambia Humanities and Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee (IRB Approval No. 2019-April-001) and the ethics committee in the Canton of Geneva (no 2019-00500).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
E-mail addresses of authors: JE: janne.estill{at}unige.ch; HS: heidi.stoeckl{at}ibe.med.uni-muenchen.de; LH: lucas.hertzog{at}uct.ac.za; ET: Elona.toska{at}uct.ac.za; PC: patrick.chanda{at}unza.zm ; patrickchanda{at}ymail.com; JM: jasonmwanza2{at}gmail.com; KK: kaira{at}ilo.org; CM: chisangu{at}palmassociates.org; GT: tembogel{at}gmail.com; OK: Olivia.Keiser{at}unige.ch; LC: lucie.cluver{at}spi.ox.ac.uk
Data Availability
The data set is not publicly available because it contains unique identifiers and respondents did not agree to have the details public, although they consented to the study.
