Abstract
Background Maladaptive self-focused attention (SFA) is a bias toward internal thoughts, feelings, and physical states. Despite its role as a core maintaining factor of symptoms in cognitive theories of social anxiety and body dysmorphic disorders, studies have not examined its neural basis. We hypothesized that maladaptive SFA would be associated with hyperconnectivity in the default mode network (DMN) in self-focused patients with these disorders.
Methods Thirty patients and 28 healthy individuals were eligible and scanned. Eligibility was determined by scoring greater than 1SD or below 1SD of the Public Self-Consciousness Scale normative mean, respectively, for each group. Fifteen patients had primary social anxiety disorder and 15 had primary body dysmorphic disorder. Seed-to-voxel functional connectivity was computed using a DMN posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) seed.
Results Patients (regardless of diagnosis) showed reduced functional connectivity of the PCC with several brain regions, including the bilateral superior parietal lobule (SPL), bilateral insula, cingulate cortex, and postcentral gyrus, compared to controls. PCC-SPL connectivity was inversely correlated with maladaptive SFA in patients but was not associated with social anxiety or body dysmorphic symptom severity, depression severity, or rumination. There was no evidence of increased functional connectivity within the DMN in patients compared to controls.
Conclusions As the SPL is part of the dorsal attention network, which is typically activated during tasks requiring externally-oriented attention, abnormal PCC-SPL connectivity in patients may reflect difficulty shifting between internal versus external attention, and may represent a transdiagnostic neural marker of maladaptive SFA that could be targeted in interventions.
Clinical Trials Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02808702 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02808702
Competing Interest Statement
All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organization for the submitted work. A.F., B.B., and J.F. have received research grants from the National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH109593, Fang; K01MH114012, Baran; R01MH121520 and R21MH110865, Feusner). S.W. has received research grant awards from Koa Health, royalty payments from New Harbinger Publications, Guilford Publications, Oxford University Press, and Springer, honorarium payments from the International OCD Foundation, Elsevier, Tourette Association of America and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Brattleboro Retreat, travel reimbursement from the International OCD Foundation and Brattleboro Retreat, as well as payment for serving on the Scientific Advisory Board of One-Mind PsyberGuide. No other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Clinical Trial
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02808702
Clinical Protocols
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02808702
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a NIMH Career Development Award K23MH109593 (A.F.). B.B. is supported by K01MH114012. J.F. is supported by R01MH121520 and R21MH110865. Authors have received no additional sources of funding for any aspect of the submitted work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Partners Human Research Committee Protocol #2016P000523
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (A.F.) upon reasonable request.
