Abstract
Background Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a promising strategy to break the chain of transmission of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV).
Aims This trial aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PrEP with various doses of HCQ against a placebo among high-risk healthcare providers (HCPs).
Methods A phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care hospital. A total of 228 HCPs were screened, we included 200 subjects with no active or past SARS-CoV-2 infection. Subjects of experimental groups 1-3 received HCQ in various doses and those in the control group received placebo. The study outcomes in terms of safety and efficacy were monitored. Participants exhibiting COVID-19 symptoms were tested for SARS-CoV-2 during the study and also by the end of the 12th week, with PCR or IgM and IgG serology.
Results Overall, 146 of 200 participants reported exposure to a confirmed COVID-19 case in the first month, 189 in the 2nd month and 192 were exposed by the 12th week of the study. Moreover, the precautionary practices, i.e. use of personal protective equipment (PPE), significantly varied; initially more than 80% of the exposed HCPs weren’t ensuring the PPE used by the patients treated by them. However, it gradually developed with the increasing knowledge of the virus. As far as safety is concerned, mild treatment-related side effects were observed among the interventional and placebo arm patients. While none of the participants were critical, and a few had mild illness by the end of the 12th week, requiring only outpatient observation with no hospitalization. There was no significant clinical benefit of PrEP with HCQ as compared to placebo (p>0.05).
Conclusion It is concluded from the study findings that the PrEP HCQ does not significantly prevent illness compatible with COVID-19 or confirmed infection among high-risk HCPs.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
A Phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04359537) was conducted at SZABMU/PIMS to evaluate the comparative efficacy of various HCQ doses in preventing COVID-19 among high-risk healthcare workers.
Funding Statement
The study drug HCQ was supplied by Getz pharma.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study protocol was approved by the ethical review board of Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University (Reference no. 1-1/2015/ERB/SZABMU/549; Dated 20 April 2020), and written informed consents were acquired from the participants before inclusion.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Paper in collection COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 preprints from medRxiv and bioRxiv
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos