Abstract
The outbreak of the pandemic disease, COVID-19, has shown that the approaches by different countries has resulted in a range of infection rates through their societies. This has arisen from the varying personal behaviour and tactical use of lockdown strategies within each country. We report the use of microsimulation of a simulated community in Australia, using a discrete infection model within a community of residences, places of work and recreation to demonstrate the applicability of this method to both the current pandemic and to infection more generally. Simulations without any societal intervention on infection spread provided base simulations that could be compared with social and societal controls in the future and which were compared with the initial doubling times of country outbreaks across the world. Different population sizes were represented in some simulations and in other simulations the effects of either social distancing or the use of facial masks as personal behaviours was investigated within the community. Good agreement is found between the initial doubling times for several countries and the simulations that suggests that modelling infection as a collection of individual infections provides an alternative to current epidemiological models. The variation of the basic reproductive number, R0, with time and population size, suggests that one of the fundamentals assumptions in SIR type models is wrong, but varies according to the properties of the population being modelled. Investigation of the infection spread shows that the number of super-spreaders varies with the size of the population and occurs through contacts in clubs, supermarkets, schools and theatres where the source of infection is an employee and where there are high numbers of contacts. The simulations of individual control show that the benefits of social distancing or wearing masks is only fully realised where there is considerable compliance within society to these measures.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The work has been self funded.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
No oversight was necessary as the work does not involve human experimentation or clinical trials. Data used as sources for modelling are in the public domain
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Paper in collection COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 preprints from medRxiv and bioRxiv
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos