Abstract
Mutations of the coronavirus responsible for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) could impede drug development and reduce the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. Here, we developed a multiplexed Spike-ACE2 Inhibitor Screening (mSAIS) assay that can measure the neutralizing effect of antibodies across numerous variants of the coronavirus’s Spike (S) protein simultaneously. By screening purified antibodies and serum from convalescent COVID-19 patients and vaccinees against 72 S variants with the mSAIS assay, we identified new S mutations that are sensitive and resistant to neutralization. Serum from both infected and vaccinated groups with a high titer of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) displayed a broader capacity to neutralize S variants than serum with low titer NAbs. These data were validated using serum from a large vaccinated cohort (n=104) with a tiled S peptide microarray. In addition, similar results were obtained using a SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus neutralization assay specific for wild-type S and four prevalent S variants (D614G, B.1.1.7, B.1.351, P.1), thus demonstrating that high antibody diversity is associated with high NAb titers. Our results demonstrate the utility of the mSAIS platform in screening NAbs. Moreover, we show that heterogeneous antibody populations provide a more protective effect against S variants, which may help direct COVID-19 vaccine and drug development.
Highlights
Developed a high throughput assay to screen the neutralizing effect of antibodies across multiple SARS-CoV-2 Spike variants simultaneously.
Characterized the heterogeneity of neutralizing antibodies produced in response to COVID-19 infection and vaccination.
Demonstrated the capacity of Spike variants neutralization is associated with the diversity of anti-Spike antibodies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31870823), National Key R&D Program of China (2020YFE0202200), State Key Laboratory of Proteomics (SKLP-C202001, SKLP-O201904, SKLP-O201703, SKLP-O202007), the National Program on Key Basic Research Project (2018YFA0507503, 2017YFC0906703, 2018ZX09733003) and the Beijing Municipal Education Commission, Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (M21003) and Beijing Municipal Science＆Technology Commission (Z201100001020001; Z201100005420022). We thank Dr. Brianne Petritis for her critical review and editing of this manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Our research was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Ditan Hospital (No. 2021-010-01), and exemption of informed consent was obtained prior to sera collection.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Paper in collection COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 preprints from medRxiv and bioRxiv
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos