Abstract
Avoiding overloading the healthcare system remains a central issue during the COVID-19 pandemic. The logic of preventing such overload situations is intuitive since the level and quality of critical care is a function of the available capacity to provide it. Where this capacity is no longer available due to a surge in admissions, patient outcomes will invariably deteriorate in the long run – ultimately leading to disproportionate mortality. In this paper, we study the three worst affected regions in Italy, the Netherlands, and Germany during the first COVID-19 wave in the spring of 2020. We report on quantitative analyses that show how mortality rises non-linearly as the proportion of COVID-19 patients in the ICU increases. We identify changes to the patient-staff ratio, increasing exhaustion and infection levels amongst staff, as well as equipment shortages, as likely causes driving this rise in mortality. We explore these findings further with interviews of key stakeholders in the respective healthcare systems. Our results demonstrate that the common approach of managing COVID-19 surges by stretching ICU capacity in hotspot regions may be detrimental to patient outcomes. Instead, we posit that transferring patients proactively out of developing hotspots to less affected regions, well before high ICU workload situations emerge, will improve overall patient outcomes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
N/A
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Approval for conducting the interviews has been granted by the University of Groningen' Institutional Review Board under reference #FEB-20200813-11644.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Paper in collection COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 preprints from medRxiv and bioRxiv
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.